Abstract
Abstract Methyl 1-butyl-carbamoyl-2-benzimidazole carbamate (benomyl) as a dilute foliar spray reduced atomspheric oxidant injury (oxidant stipple) on ‘Ives’ and ‘Concord’ grapevines ( Vitis labrusca L.) in 3 vineyard experiments in 1972. Three to 7 multiple applications at 1.12, 3.36, and 6.72 kg/ha increased the protection over unsprayed ‘Concord’ vines. Single and double applications were ineffective. The degree of protection afforded was directly related to the frequency of benomyl application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Dilute benomyl foliar spray reduced oxidant stipple on Ives and Concord grapevines in vineyard experiments.
- Material
- ‘Ives’ and ‘Concord’e0
- Treatment
- benomyl) as a dilute foliar spraye0
- Outcome
- atomspheric oxidant injury (oxidant stipple)e0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Setting
- vineyarde0
VitisNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Methyl 1-butyl-carbamoyl-2-benzimidazole carbamate (benomyl) as a dilute foliar spray reduced atomspheric oxidant injury (oxidant stipple) on ‘Ives’ and ‘Concord’ grapevines ( Vitis labrusca L.) in 3 vineyard experiments in 1972.”
Claim · model-written summary
Three to seven benomyl applications increased protection of Concord vines over unsprayed vines.
- Material
- ‘Concord’e0
- Treatment
- Three to 7 multiple applications at 1.12, 3.36, and 6.72 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- protectione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- unsprayed ‘Concord’ vinese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three to 7 multiple applications at 1.12, 3.36, and 6.72 kg/ha increased the protection over unsprayed ‘Concord’ vines.”
t0“Grapevines”
Claim · model-written summary
Single and double benomyl applications were ineffective.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Single and double applications were ineffective.”
e1“benomyl) as a dilute foliar spray”
t0“Grapevines”
Claim · model-written summary
Protection rose with frequency of benomyl application.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The degree of protection afforded was directly related to the frequency of benomyl application.”
t0“Grapevines”
The same questions in other papers
benomyl · crop injury · VitisResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · crop injury · VitisPositive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.