Paper · 2004 · Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research

LAND AND WATER EXPLOITATION FOR MAXIMIZING PRODUCTIVITY OF TOMATO INTERCROPPED WITH FABA BEAN CROP UNDER STRESS ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS AT TOSHKY

ALI I.N. ABDEL-AAL; ABDEL-HAFEZ A. ZOHRY

9
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The optimistic Toshky National Project is representing strong challenge to cultivate new reclaimed lands under stress ecological situa­tion. The aim of this research is to compare competition between natural rock phosphate and super phosphate fertilizers on single crop as well as Intercropping tomato with faba bean, most important legume fool crop; for utilizing land equivalent per water unit an experiment was carried out for two years during 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 seasons, at the South Valley Agriculture Research Station, Toshky. in a randomized complete block design. The treatments included phosphate sources (natural rock phosphate and super phosphate) as well as doses. Transplanting dates for tomato hybrid (castle rock) were on island 7th September In 2001/ 2002 and 2002/2003 seasons, respectively. Sowing dates of faba bean (variety Giza 40) were 15th and 22nd October in two seasons, respec­tively. Tomato seedlings were transplanted on one side for each lateral 50 cm between drippers. Fabe bean seeds were planted in hills spaced 10 cm between hills, one plant per hill. The obtained results indicated that yield and yield components of gibe bean were decreased by intercropping faba bean with tomato as compared with faba bean grown alone, in both seasons. The response of seed yielcUld and yield components to phosphate levels was linear be­tween zero and 60 Kg P205/f 0. Intercropping tomato with labs bean compared with grown tomato separated in both seasons decreased to­mato fruits yield and marketable traits yield. Also, results indicated that in all studies of tomato characters improved with increasing phosphate fertilizer, except culls percentage which decreased with increasing phos­phate fertilizer compared to control in both seasons. Total yield and mar­ketable yield increased with increasing mixed phosphate from [IS Kg P205 (NP) + IS Kg P205 (SP)) to [45 Kg P205 (NP) + 45 Kg P205 (SP)) compare to control In both seasons. The highest value for Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was 1.91 and 1.99 lot the treatment using mixed phosphate [45 Kg P205 NP) + 45 Kg P205 (SP)) in the first and second seasons, respectively. It may be worth mentioning that intercropping to­mato with faba bean has maximized utility of irrigation water by saving 31 % compared to separate treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced faba bean yield and yield components relative to sole cropping in both seasons.

Taxon
gibe beane0
Treatment
intercropping faba bean with tomatoe0
Outcome
yield and yield componentse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
faba bean grown alonee0

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of gibe bean were decreased by intercropping faba bean with tomato as compared with faba bean grown alone, in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1275 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield and yield components responded linearly to phosphate up to 60 Kg P205/f 0.

Treatment
phosphate levelse0
Outcome
seed yielcUld and yield componentse0
Qualifier
zero and 60 Kg P205/f 0e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The response of seed yielcUld and yield components to phosphate levels was linear be­tween zero and 60 Kg P205/f 0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping reduced tomato fruit and marketable yield relative to separate growing.

Treatment
Intercropping tomato with labs beane0
Outcome
to­mato fruits yield and marketable traits yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
grown tomato separatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intercropping tomato with labs bean compared with grown tomato separated in both seasons decreased to­mato fruits yield and marketable traits yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1540 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphate fertilizer improved tomato characters except culls percentage.

Treatment
increasing phosphate fertilizere0
Outcome
tomato characterse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all studies of tomato characters improved with increasing phosphate fertilizer, except culls percentage which decreased with increasing phos­phate fertilizer compared to control in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1574–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing phosphate fertilizer decreased culls percentage relative to control.

Treatment
increasing phos­phate fertilizere0
Outcome
culls percentagee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“culls percentage which decreased with increasing phos­phate fertilizer compared to control in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing mixed phosphate increased total and marketable yield relative to control.

Treatment
increasing mixed phosphatee0
Outcome
Total yield and mar­ketable yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Total yield and mar­ketable yield increased with increasing mixed phosphate from [IS Kg P205 (NP) + IS Kg P205 (SP)) to [45 Kg P205 (NP) + 45 Kg P205 (SP)) compare to control In both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1769–1959 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high mixed phosphate treatment had LER 1.91 in the first season.

Outcome
Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.91e0
Qualifier
firste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value for Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was 1.91 and 1.99 lot the treatment using mixed phosphate [45 Kg P205 NP) + 45 Kg P205 (SP)) in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2149 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The high mixed phosphate treatment had LER 1.99 in the second season.

Outcome
Land Equivalent Ratio (LER)e0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.99e0
Qualifier
seconde0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value for Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) was 1.91 and 1.99 lot the treatment using mixed phosphate [45 Kg P205 NP) + 45 Kg P205 (SP)) in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1961–2149 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato-faba bean intercropping saved 31 % irrigation water relative to separate treatments.

Taxon
to­matoe0
Treatment
intercropping to­mato with faba beane0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savinge0
Value
31 %e0
Comparator
separate treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping to­mato with faba bean has maximized utility of irrigation water by saving 31 % compared to separate treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2183–2308 · show in text ↑

intercropping · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

101 papers: 80 positive, 21 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

intercropping · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · organism · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.