Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Assessing environmental impact of genetically modified seeds in Brazilian agriculture

Renato Nunes de Lima Seixas; José Maria Ferreira Jardim da Silveira; Vinícius Eduardo Ferrari

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Genetically modified (GM) seeds have had relevant impacts on worldwide agriculture, even with a limited number of essential traits launched in the markets. The focus on platforms crops has favored the combination of traditional breeding, GM insertion, and diffusion in agriculture. One of the remarkable features of the GM traits has been the close link with pest and weed control systems. We investigate the environmental effects due to pesticides for two different GM seeds: insect resistant (IR) cotton and herbicide tolerant (HT) soybeans in a particular period of Brazilian agriculture, 2009-2013. We use a dataset on commercial farms' use of pesticides and biotechnology in Brazil to document environmental effects of GM traits. We explore within farm variation for farmers planting conventional and GM seeds to identify the effect of adoption on the environmental impact of pesticides measured as the quantity of active ingredients of chemicals and the Environmental Impact Quotient (EIQ) index. The findings show that the IR trait reduces application of insecticides by 22% and the associated environmental impact by 20% the environmental impact of insecticides. However, for HT traits, we find that application of herbicides increases by 55.8% and the associated environmental impact by 44.4%, showing a significant increase in the EIQ. The HT results are driven by an increase of less toxic herbicides elevenfold larger than the decrease in less toxic ones, which we interpret as evidence of weak substitutability between herbicides of different toxicity levels. Addressing what happened in the last decade, the paper also presents a view of the transformations in GM usage in Brazil, focusing on the considerable success in adopting stacked genes. Future perspectives point to a more diversified menu of technologies, crops, and adopting countries, going beyond platform crops and more prominent agriculture exporters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR cotton reduced insecticide application by 22%.

Treatment
IR traite0
Outcome
application of insecticidese0
Direction
reducese0
Value
22%e0
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the IR trait reduces application of insecticides by 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“insect resistant (IR) cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–505 · show in text ↑
e2

“farmers planting conventional and GM seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IR cotton reduced insecticide environmental impact by 20%.

Treatment
IR traite1
Outcome
environmental impact of insecticidese0
Direction
reducese1
Value
20%e0
Comparator
conventionale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the associated environmental impact by 20% the environmental impact of insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1169 · show in text ↑
e1

“the IR trait reduces application of insecticides by 22%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1081 · show in text ↑
e2

“insect resistant (IR) cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–505 · show in text ↑
e3

“farmers planting conventional and GM seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HT soybean adoption increased herbicide application by 55.8%.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment
herbicide tolerante1
Outcome
application of herbicidese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
55.8%e0
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of herbicides increases by 55.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“herbicide tolerant (HT) soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–542 · show in text ↑
e2

“farmers planting conventional and GM seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

HT soybean adoption increased herbicide environmental impact by 44.4%.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment
herbicide tolerante1
Outcome
environmental impacte0
Direction
increasee0
Value
44.4%e0
Comparator
conventionale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the associated environmental impact by 44.4%, showing a significant increase in the EIQ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1344 · show in text ↑
e1

“herbicide tolerant (HT) soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–542 · show in text ↑
e2

“farmers planting conventional and GM seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–814 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed HT results to herbicide substitution patterns.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe1
Outcome
weak substitutabilitye0
Value
elevenfolde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The HT results are driven by an increase of less toxic herbicides elevenfold larger than the decrease in less toxic ones, which we interpret as evidence of weak substitutability between herbicides of different toxicity levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1571 · show in text ↑
e1

“herbicide tolerant (HT) soybeans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–542 · show in text ↑

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.