Paper · 2022 · Gesunde Pflanzen

Effect of Potassium Silicate and Irrigation on Grain Nutrient Uptake and Water Use Efficiency of Wheat Under Calcareous Soils

Hani Saber Saudy; Emad M. M. Salem; Wasfi Ramadan Abd El-Momen

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
100
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract In calcareous soil, two field experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of two potassium silicate treatments (with and without) and three irrigation levels (100, 80 and 60%, of crop evapotranspiration, abbreviated as IW100, IW80 and IW60, respectively) on wheat yield and nutrient uptake and water use efficiency (WUE). The experimental design was a strip plots design in randomized complete block arrangement with three replicates. Findings reveal that potassium silicate improved grain weight spike −1 by about 1.06 times whether with IW80 or IW60. Also, seed index increased by 1.03, 1.06 and 1.04 times owing to potassium silicate in the 1st season under IW100, IW80 and IW60 treatments, respectively. Application of potassium silicate surpassed the control treatment by about 1.05, 1.4 and 1.07 times for biological straw and grain yields under IW80. The interaction of IW80 × potassium silicate significantly equaled IW100 × potassium silicate for P, S Mg and Mn uptake in both seasons as well as N, K and Zn uptake in the 1st season and Fe uptake in the 2nd season. IW80 or IW60 with potassium silicate application were the efficient combinations for improving WUE in both growing seasons.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate improved wheat grain weight per spike under IW80 or IW60 by about 1.06 times.

Treatment
potassium silicatee0
Outcome
grain weight spike −1e0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1.06 timese0
Qualifier
IW80 or IW60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potassium silicate improved grain weight spike −1 by about 1.06 times whether with IW80 or IW60.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–571 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate increased wheat seed index 1.03 times under IW100 in the first season.

Treatment
potassium silicatee0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.03e0
Qualifier
1st season under IW100e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed index increased by 1.03, 1.06 and 1.04 times owing to potassium silicate in the 1st season under IW100, IW80 and IW60 treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate increased wheat seed index 1.06 times under IW80 in the first season.

Treatment
potassium silicatee0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.06e0
Qualifier
1st season under IW100, IW80 and IW60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed index increased by 1.03, 1.06 and 1.04 times owing to potassium silicate in the 1st season under IW100, IW80 and IW60 treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate increased wheat seed index 1.04 times under IW60 in the first season.

Treatment
potassium silicatee0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.04e0
Qualifier
1st season under IW100, IW80 and IW60e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed index increased by 1.03, 1.06 and 1.04 times owing to potassium silicate in the 1st season under IW100, IW80 and IW60 treatments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under IW80, potassium silicate increased biological yield about 1.05 times over control.

Treatment
potassium silicatee0
Outcome
biologicale0
Direction
surpassede0
Value
1.05e0
Qualifier
IW80e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of potassium silicate surpassed the control treatment by about 1.05, 1.4 and 1.07 times for biological straw and grain yields under IW80.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under IW80, potassium silicate increased straw yield about 1.4 times over control.

Treatment
potassium silicatee0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
surpassede0
Value
1.4e0
Qualifier
IW80e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of potassium silicate surpassed the control treatment by about 1.05, 1.4 and 1.07 times for biological straw and grain yields under IW80.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under IW80, potassium silicate increased grain yield about 1.07 times over control.

Treatment
potassium silicatee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
surpassede0
Value
1.07e0
Qualifier
IW80e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of potassium silicate surpassed the control treatment by about 1.05, 1.4 and 1.07 times for biological straw and grain yields under IW80.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IW80 with potassium silicate equaled IW100 with potassium silicate for P, S, Mg and Mn uptake in both seasons.

Treatment
IW80 × potassium silicatee0
Outcome
P, S Mg and Mn uptakee0
Direction
equalede0
Qualifier
both seasonse0
Comparator
IW100 × potassium silicatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IW80 × potassium silicate significantly equaled IW100 × potassium silicate for P, S Mg and Mn uptake in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1012 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IW80 with potassium silicate equaled IW100 with potassium silicate for N, K and Zn uptake in the first season.

Treatment
IW80 × potassium silicatee1
Outcome
N, K and Zn uptakee0
Direction
equalede1
Qualifier
1st seasone0
Comparator
IW100 × potassium silicatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N, K and Zn uptake in the 1st season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“IW80 × potassium silicate significantly equaled IW100 × potassium silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IW80 with potassium silicate equaled IW100 with potassium silicate for Fe uptake in the second season.

Treatment
IW80 × potassium silicatee1
Outcome
Fe uptakee0
Direction
equalede1
Qualifier
2nd seasone0
Comparator
IW100 × potassium silicatee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe uptake in the 2nd season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“IW80 × potassium silicate significantly equaled IW100 × potassium silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IW80 or IW60 with potassium silicate improved wheat water-use efficiency in both seasons.

Treatment
IW80 or IW60 with potassium silicate applicatione0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
improvinge0
Qualifier
both growing seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IW80 or IW60 with potassium silicate application were the efficient combinations for improving WUE in both growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–102 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

20 papers: 18 positive, 2 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

silicate(4-) · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

silicate(4-) · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 71 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

potassium · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.