Paper · 1972 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

The Quality of ‘Red Delicious’ Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation1

C. R. Unrath

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Irrigation and evaporative cooling of ‘Red Delicious’ apple trees over 2 growing seasons resulted in a reduction in environmental stress as evidenced by plant and air temp reductions (8). The trees were spot-picked weekly, based on acceptable color to meet grade standards. Harvesting was completed one week earlier on trees receiving overtree sprinkler irrigation as compared to those with undertree or no irrigation. Fruit from trees which received overtree irrigation had greater surface coloration and nearly twice as much surface area with good solid red color as fruit which received undertree or no irrigation. Overtree irrigation improved fruit size and shape during 1969 but not 1970; increased soluble solids, and reduced cork spot and bitter pit in 1970. Lower firmness of overtree irrigated apples in 1969 was attributed to their greater size. Irrigation (over and undertree) had no influence upon internal breakdown measured after 4 months of storage at 32°F.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and evaporative cooling of apple trees reduced environmental stress, shown by lower plant and air temperatures.

Treatment
Irrigation and evaporative coolinge1
Outcome
environmental stresse2
Direction
reductione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Irrigation and evaporative cooling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“resulted in a reduction in environmental stress as evidenced by plant and air temp reductions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from trees with overtree irrigation had greater surface coloration than fruit with undertree or no irrigation.

Treatment
overtree irrigatione3
Outcome
surface coloratione3
Direction
greatere3
Comparator
undertree or no irrigatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruit from trees which received overtree irrigation had greater surface coloration and nearly twice as much surface area with good solid red color as fruit which received undertree or no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit from trees with overtree irrigation had nearly twice as much surface area with good solid red color as fruit with undertree or no irrigation.

Treatment
overtree irrigatione3
Outcome
surface area with good solid red colore3
Direction
nearly twice as muche3
Value
nearly twicee3
Comparator
undertree or no irrigatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fruit from trees which received overtree irrigation had greater surface coloration and nearly twice as much surface area with good solid red color as fruit which received undertree or no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting was completed one week earlier on trees with overtree sprinkler irrigation than on trees with undertree or no irrigation.

Treatment
overtree sprinkler irrigatione4
Outcome
Harvestinge4
Direction
one week earliere4
Value
one weeke4
Comparator
undertree or no irrigatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“Harvesting was completed one week earlier on trees receiving overtree sprinkler irrigation as compared to those with undertree or no irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 283–426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overtree irrigation improved apple fruit size and shape in 1969 but not in 1970.

Treatment
Overtree irrigatione5
Outcome
fruit size and shapee5
Direction
improvede5
Qualifier
during 1969 but not 1970e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Overtree irrigation improved fruit size and shape during 1969 but not 1970”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–701 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower firmness of overtree-irrigated apples in 1969 was attributed to their greater fruit size.

Treatment
overtree irrigatede6
Outcome
firmnesse6
Qualifier
attributed to their greater sizee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lower firmness of overtree irrigated apples in 1969 was attributed to their greater size”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overtree irrigation increased apple soluble solids in 1970.

Treatment
Overtree irrigatione7
Outcome
soluble solidse7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
in 1970e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“Overtree irrigation improved fruit size and shape during 1969 but not 1970; increased soluble solids, and reduced cork spot and bitter pit in 1970”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overtree irrigation reduced cork spot and bitter pit in apples in 1970.

Treatment
Overtree irrigatione7
Outcome
cork spot and bitter pite7
Direction
reducede7
Qualifier
in 1970e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“Overtree irrigation improved fruit size and shape during 1969 but not 1970; increased soluble solids, and reduced cork spot and bitter pit in 1970”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had no influence on apple internal breakdown after 4 months of storage at 32°F.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
internal breakdowne0
Direction
no influencee0
Qualifier
after 4 months of storage at 32°Fe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Apples As Affected By Overtree Sprinkler Irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“Irrigation (over and undertree) had no influence upon internal breakdown measured after 4 months of storage at 32°F”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–980 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 17 positive, 9 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.