Abstract
Abstract Foliar absorption of RbCl, RbNO 3 and Rb 2 SO 4 by Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis White was greatest at pH 2, at which there was considerable leaf damage, but changed little at pH 3-10. Absorption of RbCl was greater than RbNO 3 or Rb 2 SO 4 regardless of pH. Absorption of Rb and phosphate as Rb phosphate was minimal at pH 3-6, but was greatly increased at pH 7-10. These results may be explained by the degree of drying and crystallization of the applied compounds on the leaf surface.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
RbCl foliar absorption was greatest at pH 2.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.
Chrysanthemum ×morifoliume0 - Material
- cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis Whitee0
- Treatment
- pH 2e0
- Outcome
- RbCle0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Qualifier
- considerable leaf damagee0
- Comparator
- pH 3-10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar absorption of RbCl, RbNO 3 and Rb 2 SO 4 by Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis White was greatest at pH 2, at which there was considerable leaf damage, but changed little at pH 3-10.”
Claim · model-written summary
RbNO 3 foliar absorption was greatest at pH 2.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliume0
- Material
- cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis Whitee0
- Treatment
- pH 2e0
- Outcome
- RbNO 3e0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Qualifier
- considerable leaf damagee0
- Comparator
- pH 3-10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar absorption of RbCl, RbNO 3 and Rb 2 SO 4 by Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis White was greatest at pH 2, at which there was considerable leaf damage, but changed little at pH 3-10.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rb 2 SO 4 foliar absorption was greatest at pH 2.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliume0
- Material
- cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis Whitee0
- Treatment
- pH 2e0
- Outcome
- Rb 2 SO 4e0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Qualifier
- considerable leaf damagee0
- Comparator
- pH 3-10e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar absorption of RbCl, RbNO 3 and Rb 2 SO 4 by Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis White was greatest at pH 2, at which there was considerable leaf damage, but changed little at pH 3-10.”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf damage was considerable at pH 2.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliume0
- Outcome
- leaf damagee0
- Direction
- considerablee0
- Qualifier
- pH 2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar absorption of RbCl, RbNO 3 and Rb 2 SO 4 by Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis White was greatest at pH 2, at which there was considerable leaf damage, but changed little at pH 3-10.”
Claim · model-written summary
Absorption of the three rubidium salts changed little over pH 3-10.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliume0
- Treatment
- pH 3-10e0
- Outcome
- Foliar absorption of RbCl, RbNO 3 and Rb 2 SO 4e0
- Direction
- changed littlee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar absorption of RbCl, RbNO 3 and Rb 2 SO 4 by Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat. cv. Giant No. 4 Indianapolis White was greatest at pH 2, at which there was considerable leaf damage, but changed little at pH 3-10.”
Claim · model-written summary
RbCl absorption exceeded absorption of the other two salts regardless of pH.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliumt0
- Outcome
- Absorption of RbCle0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- regardless of pHe0
- Comparator
- RbNO 3 or Rb 2 SO 4e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Absorption of RbCl was greater than RbNO 3 or Rb 2 SO 4 regardless of pH.”
t0“Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Absorption of Rb and phosphate as Rb phosphate was minimal at pH 3-6.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliumt0
- Outcome
- Absorption of Rb and phosphate as Rb phosphatee0
- Direction
- minimale0
- Qualifier
- pH 3-6e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Absorption of Rb and phosphate as Rb phosphate was minimal at pH 3-6, but was greatly increased at pH 7-10.”
t0“Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Absorption of Rb and phosphate as Rb phosphate greatly increased at pH 7-10.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliumt0
- Treatment
- pH 7-10e0
- Outcome
- Absorption of Rb and phosphate as Rb phosphatee0
- Direction
- greatly increasede0
- Comparator
- pH 3-6e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Absorption of Rb and phosphate as Rb phosphate was minimal at pH 3-6, but was greatly increased at pH 7-10.”
t0“Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.”
Claim · model-written summary
Drying and crystallization of applied compounds on leaves may explain the absorption patterns.
- Taxon
- Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.Chrysanthemum ×morifoliumt0
- Outcome
- These resultse0
- Qualifier
- degree of drying and crystallization of the applied compounds on the leaf surfacee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“These results may be explained by the degree of drying and crystallization of the applied compounds on the leaf surface.”
t0“Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.”
The same questions in other papers
ph · nutrient: content · Chrysanthemum x morifolium (florist's daisy)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.