Paper · 2022 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Damage Potential and Management of Sorghum Shoot Fly Atherigona soccata on Sorghum with Seed Treatment

Sakshi Saxena; A. K. Badaya; Shivani Suman; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment conducted at the sorghum research field, College of Agriculture, Indore Madhya Pradesh during kharif 2019-20 evaluated six seed dressing chemicals along with soil application of carbofuran against shoot fly Atherigona soccata (Rondani). Significantly least deadheart (1.36 to 15.95%) was observed with thiamethoxam+ cyantraniliprole followed by thiamethoxam 30FS (1.61 to 21.76%). Soil application of carbofuran resulted in less efficacy (2.96 to 38.21%). The mean yield obtained was 29.13 q/ha in protected plots as against 16.20 q/ha in unprotected plots. Mean deadheart incidence was 11.59% in protected plots and 58.23% in unprotected plots. The avoidable loss in term of deadheart was recorded to be 80.10%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam plus cyantraniliprole had the least shoot fly deadheart, 1.36 to 15.95%.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
thiamethoxam+ cyantraniliprolee0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatat0pest
Outcome
deadhearte0
Direction
leaste0
Value
1.36 to 15.95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly least deadheart (1.36 to 15.95%) was observed with thiamethoxam+ cyantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Shoot Fly Atherigona soccata on Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam 30FS followed the most effective treatment for deadheart, with 1.61 to 21.76%.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
thiamethoxam 30FSe0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatat0pest
Outcome
deadhearte1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
1.61 to 21.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by thiamethoxam 30FS (1.61 to 21.76%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significantly least deadheart (1.36 to 15.95%) was observed with thiamethoxam+ cyantraniliprole”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Shoot Fly Atherigona soccata on Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil carbofuran was less effective against shoot fly, with 2.96 to 38.21% deadheart.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
Soil application of carbofurane0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatat0pest
Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
2.96 to 38.21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil application of carbofuran resulted in less efficacy (2.96 to 38.21%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Shoot Fly Atherigona soccata on Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected plots yielded 29.13 q/ha versus 16.20 q/ha in unprotected plots.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
protected plotse0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatat0pest
Outcome
mean yielde0
Direction
as againste0
Value
29.13 q/hae0
Qualifier
16.20 q/hae0
Comparator
unprotected plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean yield obtained was 29.13 q/ha in protected plots as against 16.20 q/ha in unprotected plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–576 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Shoot Fly Atherigona soccata on Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protected plots had 11.59% mean deadheart incidence versus 58.23% in unprotected plots.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
protected plotse0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatat0pest
Outcome
Mean deadheart incidencee0
Value
11.59%e0
Qualifier
58.23%e0
Comparator
unprotected plotse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean deadheart incidence was 11.59% in protected plots and 58.23% in unprotected plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Shoot Fly Atherigona soccata on Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Avoidable deadheart loss was estimated at 80.10%.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Interactor
Atherigona soccataAtherigona soccatat0pest
Outcome
avoidable loss in term of deadhearte0
Value
80.10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Atherigona soccata
Atherigona soccata · InteractorKhan, Kakar & Kamran (2024) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The avoidable loss in term of deadheart was recorded to be 80.10%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sorghum Shoot Fly Atherigona soccata on Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–82 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · Atherigona soccata · SorghumPositive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

thiamethoxam · Atherigona soccata · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · Atherigona soccata · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.