Abstract
Abstract Bench chip budding was tested as an alternative to T-budding of roses in field bush production. Greater than 90% success was obtained when ‘Mirandy’ scions ( Rosa hybrida L.) were bench chip budded to rooted ‘Brooks 56’ R. multiflora Thunb. rootstocks with a Liliput budding tool. Growth of chip budded scions was inhibited by the presence of rootstock lateral shoots. This correlative inhibition was overcome by selected forcing, girdling, and pruning treatments to promote vigorous scion growth. Best chip bud growth was obtained when scions were budded onto the same side as rootstock lateral shoots and rootstock stems were partially cut or girdled. A positive correlation existed between ‘Mirandy’ scion shoot growth and flowering.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Bench chip budding produced greater than 90% success with Mirandy scions on Brooks 56 rootstocks.
- Taxon
- Rosa hybrida L.
Rosa hybrid cultivare0 - Material
- ‘Mirandy’e0
- Treatment
- bench chip buddede0
- Outcome
- successe0
- Value
- Greater than 90%e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Greater than 90% success was obtained when ‘Mirandy’ scions ( Rosa hybrida L.) were bench chip budded to rooted ‘Brooks 56’ R. multiflora Thunb. rootstocks with a Liliput budding tool.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock lateral shoots inhibited chip budded scion growth.
- Taxon
- Rosest0
- Treatment
- presence of rootstock lateral shootse0
- Outcome
- Growth of chip budded scionse0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Growth of chip budded scions was inhibited by the presence of rootstock lateral shoots.”
t0“Roses”
Claim · model-written summary
Selected forcing, girdling and pruning overcame the inhibition of scion growth.
- Taxon
- Rosest0
- Treatment
- selected forcing, girdling, and pruning treatmentse0
- Outcome
- scion growthe0
- Direction
- overcomee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“This correlative inhibition was overcome by selected forcing, girdling, and pruning treatments to promote vigorous scion growth.”
t0“Roses”
Claim · model-written summary
Budding scions on the same side as lateral shoots with partial cutting or girdling gave the best chip bud growth.
- Taxon
- Rosest0
- Treatment
- scions were budded onto the same side as rootstock lateral shoots and rootstock stems were partially cut or girdlede0
- Outcome
- chip bud growthe0
- Direction
- Beste0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Best chip bud growth was obtained when scions were budded onto the same side as rootstock lateral shoots and rootstock stems were partially cut or girdled.”
t0“Roses”
Claim · model-written summary
Mirandy scion shoot growth was positively correlated with flowering.
Verbatim
e0“A positive correlation existed between ‘Mirandy’ scion shoot growth and flowering.”
t0“Roses”
The same questions in other papers
grafting · growth · RosaPositive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →pruning · growth · RosaPositive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.