Paper · 1992 · HortScience

FIELD SCREENING OF ROSA ROOTSTOCKS FOR TOLERANCE TO ALKALINE SOIL

David Wm. Reed; Yin-Tung Wang; Brent H. Pemberton

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Roses are adapted for growth and production on acid to slightly acid soil. When grown on alkaline soil sites, without extensive soil modification and acid forming and/or iron chelate fertilization, growth is reduced and severe iron chlorosis is prevalent. This study screened 24 Rosa rootstock species and selections on one acid and two alkaline soil sites for 2 consecutive years. Plants were observed for chlorosis, chlorophyll content, fresh and dry weight production and overall quality. A final reciprocal grafting study using susceptible and tolerant selections was conducted to assure the scion could realize the adaptability of the rootstock. Overall, the following five selections consistently exhibited greater growth and decreased chlorosis on the alkaline sites: R. odorata, R. canina, R. manetii, R. sp. “Mexican”, R. fortuniana , and R. multiflora selection K-l. All other R. multiflora selections performed poorly. On the acid soil site, all rootstocks grew well. When susceptible selections were budded onto tolerant rootstocks, the scions exhibited a higher degree of tolerance. Tolerant selections budded onto susceptible rootstocks exhibited increased chlorosis and decreased growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Named selections had greater growth on alkaline sites.

Taxon
ROSARosat0
Material
R. odorata, R. canina, R. manetii, R. sp. “Mexican”, R. fortuniana , and R. multiflora selection K-le0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
greatere0
Setting
alkaline sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the following five selections consistently exhibited greater growth and decreased chlorosis on the alkaline sites: R. odorata, R. canina, R. manetii, R. sp. “Mexican”, R. fortuniana , and R. multiflora selection K-l.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Named selections had less chlorosis on alkaline sites.

Taxon
ROSARosat0
Material
R. odorata, R. canina, R. manetii, R. sp. “Mexican”, R. fortuniana , and R. multiflora selection K-le0
Outcome
chlorosise0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
alkaline sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the following five selections consistently exhibited greater growth and decreased chlorosis on the alkaline sites: R. odorata, R. canina, R. manetii, R. sp. “Mexican”, R. fortuniana , and R. multiflora selection K-l.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other R. multiflora selections performed poorly.

Taxon
ROSARosat0
Material
R. multiflora selectionse0
Outcome
performed poorlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All other R. multiflora selections performed poorly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All rootstocks grew well at the acid soil site.

Taxon
ROSARosat0
Outcome
grew welle0
Setting
acid soil sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On the acid soil site, all rootstocks grew well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scions from susceptible selections showed greater tolerance when budded onto tolerant rootstocks.

Taxon
ROSARosat0
Organ / stage
scionse0
Treatment
budded onto tolerant rootstockse0
Outcome
degree of tolerancee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When susceptible selections were budded onto tolerant rootstocks, the scions exhibited a higher degree of tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1095 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant selections on susceptible rootstocks had increased chlorosis.

Taxon
ROSARosat0
Treatment
budded onto susceptible rootstockse0
Outcome
chlorosise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tolerant selections budded onto susceptible rootstocks exhibited increased chlorosis and decreased growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerant selections on susceptible rootstocks had decreased growth.

Taxon
ROSARosat0
Treatment
budded onto susceptible rootstockse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa
Rosa · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tolerant selections budded onto susceptible rootstocks exhibited increased chlorosis and decreased growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“ROSA ROOTSTOCKS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–34 · show in text ↑

grafting · growth · RosaPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.