Paper · 1985 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effect of Cyanogenic Glycosides on Growth of Callus from Almond and Plum

Charles W. Heuser

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The effects of the cyanogenic glycosides, amygdalin and prunasin, and their breakdown products, cyanide and benzaldehyde, on callus derived from ‘Marianna 2624’ plum ( Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. × P. munsoniana Wight & Hedr.) and on that from 2 almond cultivars ( P. amygdalus Batsch ‘Nonpareil’ and ‘Texas’) were compared. Prunasin (D-Mandelonitrile-β-D-glucoside) inhibited the growth of ‘Marianna 2624’ plum and ‘Nonpareil’ almond callus but not ‘Texas’ almond. Amygdalin (D-Mandelonitrile-β-D-gentiobioside) inhibited ‘Marianna 2624’ plum callus growth but promoted growth of both almond cultivars. All 3 cultivars were inhibited to the same extent by sodium cyanide, indicating that cyanide was not the differentiating inhibitory breakdown product of the cyanogenic glycosides. Benzaldehyde, another catabolite of prunasin and amygdalin, was strongly inhibitory to ‘Marianna 2624’ plum callus growth at 0.05 m m , but a concentration of 5 m m was required to inhibit similarly growth of either almond callus. The greater sensitivity of ‘Marianna 2624’ plum callus, compared to almond callus, to the cyanogenic glycosides and benzaldehyde, but not cyanide, suggests that benzaldehyde is an important factor in the almond/plum incompatibility.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prunasin inhibited Marianna plum callus growth.

Material
‘Marianna 2624’e0
Treatment
Prunasine0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunasin (D-Mandelonitrile-β-D-glucoside) inhibited the growth of ‘Marianna 2624’ plum and ‘Nonpareil’ almond callus but not ‘Texas’ almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prunasin inhibited Nonpareil almond callus growth.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Material
‘Nonpareil’e0
Treatment
Prunasine0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunasin (D-Mandelonitrile-β-D-glucoside) inhibited the growth of ‘Marianna 2624’ plum and ‘Nonpareil’ almond callus but not ‘Texas’ almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prunasin did not inhibit Texas almond callus.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Material
‘Texas’e0
Treatment
Prunasine0
Outcome
calluse0
Direction
note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Prunasin (D-Mandelonitrile-β-D-glucoside) inhibited the growth of ‘Marianna 2624’ plum and ‘Nonpareil’ almond callus but not ‘Texas’ almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amygdalin inhibited Marianna plum callus growth.

Material
‘Marianna 2624’e0
Treatment
Amygdaline0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amygdalin (D-Mandelonitrile-β-D-gentiobioside) inhibited ‘Marianna 2624’ plum callus growth but promoted growth of both almond cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amygdalin promoted growth of both almond cultivars.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Material
both almond cultivarse0
Treatment
Amygdaline0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Amygdalin (D-Mandelonitrile-β-D-gentiobioside) inhibited ‘Marianna 2624’ plum callus growth but promoted growth of both almond cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium cyanide inhibited all three cultivars equally.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Treatment
sodium cyanidee0
Outcome
cultivarse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“All 3 cultivars were inhibited to the same extent by sodium cyanide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benzaldehyde strongly inhibited Marianna plum callus at 0.05 m m.

Material
‘Marianna 2624’e0
Treatment
Benzaldehydee0
Outcome
callus growthe0
Direction
strongly inhibitorye0
Value
0.05 m me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Benzaldehyde, another catabolite of prunasin and amygdalin, was strongly inhibitory to ‘Marianna 2624’ plum callus growth at 0.05 m m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Almond callus required 5 m m benzaldehyde for similar inhibition.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise0
Treatment
Benzaldehydee1
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
inhibite0
Value
5 m me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a concentration of 5 m m was required to inhibit similarly growth of either almond callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“Benzaldehyde, another catabolite of prunasin and amygdalin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–847 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater plum sensitivity suggests benzaldehyde contributes to almond/plum incompatibility.

Compound
benzaldehydee0
Outcome
almond/plum incompatibilitye0
Qualifier
suggestse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greater sensitivity of ‘Marianna 2624’ plum callus, compared to almond callus, to the cyanogenic glycosides and benzaldehyde, but not cyanide, suggests that benzaldehyde is an important factor in the almond/plum incompatibility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1251 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Prunus dulcis (almond)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

pruning · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.