Paper · 1989 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Irrigation Regimes on Yield and Water Use of Summer Squash

J. R. Stansell; D. A. Smittle

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
14
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Summer squash ( Cucurbita pepo L. cv. Dixie hybrid) were grown in drainage lysimeters under closely controlled and monitored soil water regimes. Variables included three irrigation treatments, three growing seasons, and two soil types. Marketable fruit yield was greatest and production cost per kilogram of marketable fruit was least when squash was irrigated at 25 kPa of soil water tension. Yields were greatest for the spring season of production and least for the fall season. Regression equations are provided to describe the relationships of water use to plant age and to compute daily evapotranspiration : pan evaporation ratios (crop factors) for squash irrigated at 25, 50, and 75 kPa of soil water tension during the spring, summer, or fall production season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Squash irrigated at 25 kPa soil water tension had the greatest marketable fruit yield.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
25 kPa of soil water tensione0
Outcome
Marketable fruit yielde0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable fruit yield was greatest and production cost per kilogram of marketable fruit was least when squash was irrigated at 25 kPa of soil water tension.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 25 kPa minimized production cost per kilogram of marketable fruit.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
25 kPa of soil water tensione0
Outcome
production cost per kilogram of marketable fruite0
Direction
leaste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable fruit yield was greatest and production cost per kilogram of marketable fruit was least when squash was irrigated at 25 kPa of soil water tension.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was highest in spring and lowest in fall.

Taxon
Summer squasht0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
fall seasone0
Setting
spring seasone0

Verbatim

e0

“Yields were greatest for the spring season of production and least for the fall season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of Irrigation Regimes on Yield and Water Use of Summer Squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–69 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Regression equations describe water use by plant age and crop factors across irrigation tensions and seasons.

Taxon
squashe0
Outcome
relationships of water use to plant agee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0

“Regression equations are provided to describe the relationships of water use to plant age and to compute daily evapotranspiration : pan evaporation ratios (crop factors) for squash irrigated at 25, 50, and 75 kPa of soil water tension during the spring, summer, or fall production season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–779 · show in text ↑

soil water · quality: postharvest · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.