Paper · 2022 · Cereal Chemistry

GT‐biplot analysis of some biochemical characteristics and mineral composition of different sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) sprouts

Kevser Karaman; Yusuf Murat Kardeş; Turhan Doran; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives The nutritional value of the sprouts has gained interest in recent years because of supplying to fiber, vitamins, minerals, and bioactive compounds such as antioxidants into the diet. The aim of the present study was to reveal the nutritional characteristics of the different sorghum genotypes exposed to sprouting process. For this purpose, some biochemical characteristics and basic mineral profiles of the sorghum sprouts were investigated. Findings According to the results, protein content ranged between 12.17% and 32.24% while the lowest total starch content was determined as to be 3.37% and the highest was 32.71%. Besides, dietary fiber content was in the range of 30.27%–46.42%. Total phenolic content and antiradical activity values of the sprouts were determined as in the range of 3.61–8.42 mg GAE/g and 11.63%–19.51%, respectively. Conclusion The results showed that the sprouting process improved the nutritional quality of sorghum compared to grains and also significant variation was observed among the genotypes in terms of examined properties. Significance and Novelty The results showed that the nutritional parameters especially phytic acid levels of the sorghum grains could be decreased by sprouting process.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum sprout protein content ranged from 12.17% to 32.24%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Outcome
protein contente0
Value
12.17% and 32.24%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content ranged between 12.17% and 32.24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum sprout starch content ranged from 3.37% to 32.71%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Outcome
total starch contente0
Value
3.37% and the highest was 32.71%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest total starch content was determined as to be 3.37% and the highest was 32.71%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum sprout dietary fiber content ranged from 30.27% to 46.42%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Outcome
dietary fiber contente0
Value
30.27%–46.42%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dietary fiber content was in the range of 30.27%–46.42%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–723 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum sprout total phenolic content ranged from 3.61 to 8.42 mg GAE/g.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Outcome
Total phenolic contente0
Value
3.61–8.42 mg GAE/ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic content and antiradical activity values of the sprouts were determined as in the range of 3.61–8.42 mg GAE/g and 11.63%–19.51%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorghum sprout antiradical activity ranged from 11.63% to 19.51%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Outcome
antiradical activitye0
Value
11.63%–19.51%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total phenolic content and antiradical activity values of the sprouts were determined as in the range of 3.61–8.42 mg GAE/g and 11.63%–19.51%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–881 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprouting improved sorghum nutritional quality relative to grains.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Treatment
sprouting processe0
Outcome
nutritional qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
grainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sprouting process improved the nutritional quality of sorghum compared to grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1001 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Examined nutritional properties varied significantly among sorghum genotypes.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Outcome
examined propertiese0
Direction
variatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant variation was observed among the genotypes in terms of examined properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1098 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprouting decreased phytic acid levels of sorghum grains.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0e1
Treatment
sprouting processe0
Outcome
phytic acid levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phytic acid levels of the sorghum grains could be decreased by sprouting process.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1267 · show in text ↑
e1

“sorghum sprouts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–459 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · SorghumPositive and negative results

18 papers: 10 positive, 8 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.