Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

CO2 Elevation and Nitrogen Supply Alter the Growth and Physiological Responses of Tomato and Barley Plants to Drought Stress

Yiting Chen; Zhenhua Wei; Heng Wan; et al.

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Global climate change will modify plants in terms of growth and physiology. To better understand the consequences of this effect, the responses of the leaf water relations and nitrogen (N) use efficiency of barley and tomato plants to elevated CO2 (e[CO2], 800 ppm) combined with progressive drought stress at two levels of N supply (N1, 0.5 g N pot−1 and N2, 1.0 g N pot−1) were studied. The plants were grown in two separate phytotrons at ambient CO2 (a[CO2], 400 ppm) and e[CO2], respectively. The leaf physiological parameters as well as carbon (C) and N concentrations were determined; plant growth, water and N use efficiencies were evaluated. The results showed that e[CO2] increased photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE) while decreased specific leaf area (SLA) in both species, whereas N supply level differentially influenced WUE in barley and tomato plants. The abscisic acid (ABA)-induced stomatal closure during progressive soil drying varied between the two species where the stomatal conductance (gs) of barley plants was more sensitive to leaf ABA than tomato plants, though CO2 environment did not affect the response in both species. Compared to a[CO2], e[CO2] reduced plant transpiration rate (Tplant) in barley but not in tomato. e[CO2] increased the leaf C:N ratio ([C:N]leaf) in plants by enhancing leaf C concentration ([C]leaf) in barley and by dilution of leaf N concentration ([N]leaf) in tomato, respectively, but N2 substantially decreased [C:N]leaf, and thus, N treatment was the dominant factor controlling [C:N]leaf. Collectively, appropriate N supply may modulate the acclimation of plants to e[CO2] and soil water deficits. This study provides some novel insights into N management of different plant species for adapting to future drier and CO2-enriched environment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased photosynthesis and water use efficiency and decreased specific leaf area in both species.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“e[CO2] increased photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE) while decreased specific leaf area (SLA) in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“of barley and tomato plants to elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–247 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased specific leaf area in barley and tomato.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
specific leaf area (SLA)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“e[CO2] increased photosynthesis and water use efficiency (WUE) while decreased specific leaf area (SLA) in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–793 · show in text ↑
e1

“of barley and tomato plants to elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–247 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen supply level influenced water use efficiency differently in barley and tomato.

Treatment
N supply levele0
Outcome
WUEe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N supply level differentially influenced WUE in barley and tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–875 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley stomatal conductance was more sensitive to leaf ABA than tomato conductance during drying.

Compound
leaf ABAe0
Outcome
stomatal conductance (gs)e0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
tomato plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance (gs) of barley plants was more sensitive to leaf ABA than tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 environment did not affect ABA-related stomatal responses in either species.

Treatment
CO2 environmente0
Outcome
the responsee0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO2 environment did not affect the response in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1158 · show in text ↑
e1

“stomatal conductance (gs) of barley plants was more sensitive to leaf ABA than tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced whole-plant transpiration in barley.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
plant transpiration rate (Tplant)e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
a[CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to a[CO2], e[CO2] reduced plant transpiration rate (Tplant) in barley but not in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 did not reduce whole-plant transpiration in tomato.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
plant transpiration rate (Tplant)e0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
a[CO2]e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to a[CO2], e[CO2] reduced plant transpiration rate (Tplant) in barley but not in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1256 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased leaf C:N ratio in barley by enhancing leaf carbon concentration.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
leaf C:N ratio ([C:N]leaf)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
enhancing leaf C concentration ([C]leaf)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“e[CO2] increased the leaf C:N ratio ([C:N]leaf) in plants by enhancing leaf C concentration ([C]leaf) in barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1369 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased leaf C:N ratio in tomato through dilution of leaf nitrogen.

Treatment
e[CO2]e0
Outcome
leaf C:N ratio ([C:N]leaf)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
dilution of leaf N concentration ([N]leaf)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“e[CO2] increased the leaf C:N ratio ([C:N]leaf) in plants by enhancing leaf C concentration ([C]leaf) in barley and by dilution of leaf N concentration ([N]leaf) in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen supply substantially decreased leaf C:N ratio.

Treatment
N2e0
Outcome
[C:N]leafe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N2 substantially decreased [C:N]leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1485 · show in text ↑
e1

“of barley and tomato plants to elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–247 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.