Abstract
A field trail was carried out at P. Kothapalli village in Ananthpur District, Andhra Pradesh, India, in Randomised Block Design, each replicated thrice during the kharif season of 2021. Two applications were used against Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) and the results revealed that the highest incremental per cent reduction of larvae was recorded in the plot treated with T6 Indoxacarb 14.5% SC (48.47) which was at par with T4 Spinosad 45%SC (42.24), T2 Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (33.7), T3 Chlorantranilprole 18.5%SC (33.17), T1 Flubendamide 480 %SC (30.89), T7 Fipronil 5%SC (29.42) and T5 Neem oil 4% (25.06) is found to be least affective than all other treatments. Cost benefit ratio were found highest in Indoxacarb 14.5% SC (1:12.6), followed by Spinosad (1:11.7), Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (1:9.85), Chlorantranilprole 18.5%SC (1:9.82) Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:8.7), Fipronil 5% SC (1:6.7), Neem oil 4℅ EC (1:7.9) as compared to control T0 (1:5.06).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb produced the greatest larval reduction at 48.47.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- T6 Indoxacarb 14.5% SCe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=60)
Helicoverpa armigerat0pest - Outcome
- reduction of larvaee0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 48.47e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_gusano_cogollero.png?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“highest incremental per cent reduction of larvae was recorded in the plot treated with T6 Indoxacarb 14.5% SC (48.47)”
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad produced larval reduction of 42.24, statistically at par with Indoxacarb.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T4 Spinosad 45%SCe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- at pare0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 42.24e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at par with T4 Spinosad 45%SC (42.24)”
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate produced larval reduction of 33.7.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T2 Emamectin benzoate 5%SGe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- reduction of larvaee1
- Value
- 33.7e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T2 Emamectin benzoate 5%SG (33.7)”
e1“incremental per cent reduction of larvae”
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantranilprole produced larval reduction of 33.17.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T3 Chlorantranilprole 18.5%SCe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- reduction of larvaee1
- Value
- 33.17e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T3 Chlorantranilprole 18.5%SC (33.17)”
e1“incremental per cent reduction of larvae”
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendamide produced larval reduction of 30.89.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T1 Flubendamide 480 %SCe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- reduction of larvaee1
- Value
- 30.89e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T1 Flubendamide 480 %SC (30.89)”
e1“incremental per cent reduction of larvae”
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil produced larval reduction of 29.42.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T7 Fipronil 5%SCe0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- reduction of larvaee1
- Value
- 29.42e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T7 Fipronil 5%SC (29.42)”
e1“incremental per cent reduction of larvae”
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil had the lowest larval reduction, 25.06.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- T5 Neem oil 4%e0
- Interactor
- Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner)Helicoverpa armigerat0pest
- Outcome
- reduction of larvaee1
- Direction
- least affectivee0
- Value
- 25.06e0
- Comparator
- all other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“T5 Neem oil 4% (25.06) is found to be least affective than all other treatments”
e1“incremental per cent reduction of larvae”
t0“Tomato Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacarb had the highest cost benefit ratio, 1:12.6.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Indoxacarb 14.5% SCe0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1:12.6e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cost benefit ratio were found highest in Indoxacarb 14.5% SC (1:12.6)”
t0“on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Spinosad cost benefit ratio was 1:11.7.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Spinosade0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe1
- Value
- 1:11.7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Spinosad (1:11.7)”
e1“Cost benefit ratio”
t0“on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Emamectin benzoate cost benefit ratio was 1:9.85.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Emamectin benzoate 5% SGe0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe1
- Value
- 1:9.85e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Emamectin benzoate 5% SG (1:9.85)”
e1“Cost benefit ratio”
t0“on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorantranilprole cost benefit ratio was 1:9.82.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Chlorantranilprole 18.5%SCe0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe1
- Value
- 1:9.82e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Chlorantranilprole 18.5%SC (1:9.82)”
e1“Cost benefit ratio”
t0“on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Flubendiamide cost benefit ratio was 1:8.7.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Flubendiamide 480 SCe0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe1
- Value
- 1:8.7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Flubendiamide 480 SC (1:8.7)”
e1“Cost benefit ratio”
t0“on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Fipronil cost benefit ratio was 1:6.7.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Fipronil 5% SCe0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe1
- Value
- 1:6.7e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fipronil 5% SC (1:6.7)”
e1“Cost benefit ratio”
t0“on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Neem oil cost benefit ratio was 1:7.9.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Neem oil 4℅ ECe0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe1
- Value
- 1:7.9e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neem oil 4℅ EC (1:7.9)”
e1“Cost benefit ratio”
t0“on Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Control plot cost benefit ratio was 1:5.06.
- Taxon
- TomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- control T0e0
- Outcome
- Cost benefit ratioe1
- Value
- 1:5.06e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“control T0 (1:5.06)”
e1“Cost benefit ratio”
t0“on Tomato”
The same questions in other papers
emamectin benzoate · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →fipronil · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
spinosad · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
13 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →indoxacarb · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
15 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →botanical · Helicoverpa armigera · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.