Paper · 2022 · Global Journal of Agricultural Research

Residual Effect of Lime Rate after Five Years and P Fertilizer Rates on Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Yield on Acidic Soil in Banja District, North Western Ethiopia

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Soil acidity problem is one of the bottlenecks to improve crop production in high rainfall regions of Ethiopia in general and in Banja district particular. This study aimed to determine the residual effect of lime and P fertilizer on the acid properties of soils and to develop models whereby the change in acidity indicators of soils can be predicted as a result of lime application. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Five levels of lime (0, 1.15, 2.3, 3.45, 4.6 t ha-1) and four levels of Phosphorous (0, 10, 20, and 30 kg ha-1) were combined in a complete factorial arrangement. The study was conducted for three consecutive years from 2015 to 2017 main cropping seasons at Banja district. Mean grain yield and yield components as affected by different levels of lime and phosphorus fertilizer. Analysis of variance showed that all limed treatments were higher mean values of grain yield and yield components relative to control plot (no lime and P) in all over combined cropping years. Moreover, over year combined mean the highest grain yields (1115.9 kg ha-1), biomass yields (3591.2 kg ha-1), number of seeds per plant (21.54), plant height (64.50 cm) and spike length (5.24 cm) were recorded under 4.6 t ha-1 of lime application of plot. The lowest grain and biomass yields were recorded in control plots. However, over year mean 4.6 t ha-1 of lime application plot the grain yield and biomass yield of wheat were increased by (151.1%) and (123.3%) related to the control plot, respectively. Hence, lime application at the rate of 3.45 t ha-1 (150% of the lime requirement of the soils based on its exchangeable acidity) coupled with 20 kg ha-1 P fertilizer could serve as a reference to boosting wheat production in the study area and similar areas with possible re-liming of the soils in every five years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All limed treatments had higher wheat grain yield and yield components than the unlimed control.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
limed treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yield and yield componentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control plot (no lime and P)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all limed treatments were higher mean values of grain yield and yield components relative to control plot (no lime and P)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.6 t ha-1 lime rate gave the highest grain yield of 1115.9 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
4.6 t ha-1 of limee0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1115.9 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yields (1115.9 kg ha-1), biomass yields (3591.2 kg ha-1), number of seeds per plant (21.54), plant height (64.50 cm) and spike length (5.24 cm) were recorded under 4.6 t ha-1 of lime application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.6 t ha-1 lime rate gave biomass yield of 3591.2 kg ha-1.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
4.6 t ha-1 of limee0
Outcome
biomass yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3591.2 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest grain yields (1115.9 kg ha-1), biomass yields (3591.2 kg ha-1), number of seeds per plant (21.54), plant height (64.50 cm) and spike length (5.24 cm) were recorded under 4.6 t ha-1 of lime application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.6 t ha-1 lime rate produced 21.54 seeds per plant.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
4.6 t ha-1 of limee0
Outcome
number of seeds per plante0
Value
21.54e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds per plant (21.54), plant height (64.50 cm) and spike length (5.24 cm) were recorded under 4.6 t ha-1 of lime application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.6 t ha-1 lime rate produced plant height of 64.50 cm.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
4.6 t ha-1 of limee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Value
64.50 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (64.50 cm) and spike length (5.24 cm) were recorded under 4.6 t ha-1 of lime application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4.6 t ha-1 lime rate produced spike length of 5.24 cm.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
4.6 t ha-1 of limee0
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Value
5.24 cme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spike length (5.24 cm) were recorded under 4.6 t ha-1 of lime application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield at 4.6 t ha-1 lime increased 151.1% relative to control.

Treatment
4.6 t ha-1 of limee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
151.1%e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.6 t ha-1 of lime application plot the grain yield and biomass yield of wheat were increased by (151.1%) and (123.3%) related to the control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass yield at 4.6 t ha-1 lime increased 123.3% relative to control.

Treatment
4.6 t ha-1 of limee0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
123.3%e0
Comparator
control plote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“4.6 t ha-1 of lime application plot the grain yield and biomass yield of wheat were increased by (151.1%) and (123.3%) related to the control plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1541 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 3.45 t ha-1 lime with 20 kg ha-1 phosphorus to boost wheat production.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
3.45 t ha-1e0
Outcome
boosting wheat productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lime application at the rate of 3.45 t ha-1 (150% of the lime requirement of the soils based on its exchangeable acidity) coupled with 20 kg ha-1 P fertilizer could serve as a reference to boosting wheat production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–83 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.