Paper · 2009 · Current World Environment

Effect of liming on soil properties, yield and nutrient uptake by wheat

B.S. Sultana; M.M.H. Mian; M.R. Islam; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of liming on chemical properties of wheat field soils and yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh. There were eight treatments of liming material applied from dolomite (CaCO 3 .MgCO 3 ). Yield and yield components of wheat were recorded at harvest and the grain and straw were analyzed for P, S, Ca and Mg contents. The post harvest soils were analyzed for pH, available P, Ca and Mg. The application of different rates of lime to soil progressively increased soil pH and increased availability of P, Ca and Mg in soils. The pH of the post harvest soils was positively correlated with available Ca and Mg status of soils. The grain yields of wheat were positively correlated with soil pH, available P, Ca and Mg contents of post harvest soils. Tiller number plant -1 , spikelets spike -1 , grains spike -1 , grain and straw yields were significantly affected by liming. The treatment T5 (2.0 t lime ha -1 ) produced grain yield of 4659 kg ha 1 which was statistically identical to those found in T 6 , T 7 and T 8 treatments but higher to those in T 1 , T2, T3 & T4 treatments. Liming markedly increased S and Mg concentrations of wheat grain but the concentrations of P and Ca remained unaffected. Total uptake of P, S, Ca and Mg were increased due to application of lime which was mainly associated with increased wheat yields. The findings showed that liming is beneficial for wheat cultivation in the Ranishankail soil series of Dinajpur. The application of 2.0 t lime ha-1 appears to be optimum for desired soil pH for wheat (>pH 6.0), increased availability of nutrients and ultimately increased wheat yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming progressively increased soil pH.

Treatment
different rates of limee1
Outcome
soil pHe1
Direction
progressively increasede1
Setting
Ranisankail soil series of Bangladeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of different rates of lime to soil progressively increased soil pH and increased availability of P, Ca and Mg in soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming increased the availability of P, Ca and Mg in soils.

Treatment
different rates of limee1
Outcome
availability of P, Ca and Mge1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Ranisankail soil series of Bangladeshe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of different rates of lime to soil progressively increased soil pH and increased availability of P, Ca and Mg in soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–581 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-harvest soil pH was positively correlated with available Ca and Mg status of soils.

Treatment
pH of the post harvest soilse2
Outcome
available Ca and Mg status of soilse2
Direction
increaseinferrede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“The pH of the post harvest soils was positively correlated with available Ca and Mg status of soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–682 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of wheat was positively correlated with soil pH in post-harvest soils.

Treatment
soil pHe3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
increaseinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e3

“The grain yields of wheat were positively correlated with soil pH, available P, Ca and Mg contents of post harvest soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–804 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of wheat was positively correlated with available P, Ca and Mg contents of post-harvest soils.

Treatment
available P, Ca and Mg contentse3
Outcome
grain yieldse3
Direction
increaseinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e3

“The grain yields of wheat were positively correlated with soil pH, available P, Ca and Mg contents of post harvest soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming significantly affected tiller number, spikelets per spike and grains per spike of wheat.

Treatment
liminge4
Outcome
Tiller number plant -1 , spikelets spike -1 , grains spike -1e4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tiller number plant -1 , spikelets spike -1 , grains spike -1 , grain and straw yields were significantly affected by liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming significantly affected grain and straw yields of wheat.

Treatment
liminge4
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tiller number plant -1 , spikelets spike -1 , grains spike -1 , grain and straw yields were significantly affected by liming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–930 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (2.0 t lime ha -1) gave a higher wheat grain yield than T1 to T4.

Treatment
2.0 t lime ha -1e5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
4659 kg ha 1e5
Comparator
T 1 , T2, T3 & T4 treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e5

“The treatment T5 (2.0 t lime ha -1 ) produced grain yield of 4659 kg ha 1 which was statistically identical to those found in T 6 , T 7 and T 8 treatments but higher to those in T 1 , T2, T3 & T4 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T5 (2.0 t lime ha -1) gave a wheat grain yield statistically identical to T6 to T8.

Treatment
2.0 t lime ha -1e5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
statistically identicale5
Comparator
T 6 , T 7 and T 8 treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e5

“The treatment T5 (2.0 t lime ha -1 ) produced grain yield of 4659 kg ha 1 which was statistically identical to those found in T 6 , T 7 and T 8 treatments but higher to those in T 1 , T2, T3 & T4 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming markedly increased S and Mg concentrations of wheat grain.

Treatment
Liminge6
Outcome
S and Mg concentrations of wheat graine6
Direction
markedly increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e6

“Liming markedly increased S and Mg concentrations of wheat grain but the concentrations of P and Ca remained unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liming left P and Ca concentrations of wheat grain unaffected.

Treatment
Liminge6
Outcome
concentrations of P and Cae6
Direction
remained unaffectede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e6

“Liming markedly increased S and Mg concentrations of wheat grain but the concentrations of P and Ca remained unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1259 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lime application increased total uptake of P, S, Ca and Mg in wheat, mainly associated with increased wheat yields.

Treatment
application of limee7
Outcome
Total uptake of P, S, Ca and Mge7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
mainly associated with increased wheat yieldse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e7

“Total uptake of P, S, Ca and Mg were increased due to application of lime which was mainly associated with increased wheat yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1390 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

A lime rate of 2.0 t lime ha-1 appears optimal for wheat soil pH above pH 6.0.

Treatment
2.0 t lime ha-1e2
Outcome
soil pHe2
Qualifier
optimum for desired soil pH for wheat (>pH 6.0)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield of wheat in Ranisankail soil series of Bangladesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 104–159 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of 2.0 t lime ha-1 appears to be optimum for desired soil pH for wheat (>pH 6.0), increased availability of nutrients and ultimately increased wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1505–1675 · show in text ↑

lime · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 30 positive, 1 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 46 positive, 9 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

lime · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 140 positive, 33 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.