Abstract
Goal. The analysis of biocomplex combinations with stimulating nature preparations and different derivative ammonium salts of dihidropirimidine and their efficience study. Methods. The bacterium strain АР-33 Pseudomonas fluorenscens was the researches subject.The biotechnological methods of researches used during the work.The concentration of viable CFU/cm3 determined as per Koch’s method. The preparation efficiency determined at different rate against fungi diseases. The records conducted as generally approved techniques with experimental methods in phytopathology and plant protection. Results.The derivatives of ammonium salts of dihydropirymidine did not show toxic action on concentration decrease of viable cells of bacterium strain АР- 33 Pseudomonas fluorescens. The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean showed the combination Planrise — 5 l/ha + 0.1% Xymedon + 0.2% succinic acid solution + 2 ml DMAE + 2 ml DMSO. All biocomplexes combinations showed preparations efficiency against diseases in the scope 59.31—69.63%. The yield increase recorded in 1.15—1.7 times in comparison with control by the results of biocomplexes usage with their fungicide, immunoprotective and stimulating action. The combination Planrise Strain bacterium АР-33 Pseudomonas fluorescens, 3 × 109 CFU/ cm3), 5 l/ha + 0.1% xymedon solution + 0.2% succinic acid solution + 2 ml DMAE + 2 ml DMSO. It was consisted of 3.4 t/ha. The preparation’s efficiency against late blight consisted of 79.1%. Conclusion. All biocomplexes’ combinations usage showed the preparations’ efficiency against diseases in scope 67.3—88.1%. The additional matters DMAE and DMSO (they have influence on transmembrane functions) usage allows to increase preparations efficiency on 8—25% in comparison with combinations without their usage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Derivatives of ammonium salts of dihydropyrimidine did not reduce viable cell concentration of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain AR-33.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe1 - Treatment
- derivatives of ammonium salts of dihydropirymidinee2
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescens
.JPG?width=60)
Pseudomonas fluorescense2biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- concentration decrease of viable cellse2
- Direction
- decreasee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.JPG?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean”
e2“The derivatives of ammonium salts of dihydropirymidine did not show toxic action on concentration decrease of viable cells of bacterium strain АР- 33 Pseudomonas fluorescens”
Claim · model-written summary
The Planrise combination with xymedon, succinic acid, DMAE and DMSO gave the best 100-seed weight and bean number in soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- Planrise — 5 l/ha + 0.1% Xymedon + 0.2% succinic acid solution + 2 ml DMAE + 2 ml DMSOe1
- Outcome
- weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forminge1
- Direction
- beste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean showed the combination Planrise — 5 l/ha + 0.1% Xymedon + 0.2% succinic acid solution + 2 ml DMAE + 2 ml DMSO”
Claim · model-written summary
All biocomplex combinations showed efficiency of 59.31–69.63% against fungal diseases.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- biocomplexes combinationse3
- Outcome
- preparations efficiency against diseasese3
- Value
- 59.31—69.63%e3
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean”
e3“All biocomplexes combinations showed preparations efficiency against diseases in the scope 59.31—69.63%”
e4“The preparation efficiency determined at different rate against fungi diseases”
Claim · model-written summary
Biocomplex use increased yield 1.15–1.7 times compared with control.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- biocomplexes usagee5
- Outcome
- yield increasee5
- Direction
- increasee5
- Value
- 1.15—1.7 timese5
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean”
e5“The yield increase recorded in 1.15—1.7 times in comparison with control by the results of biocomplexes usage with their fungicide, immunoprotective and stimulating action”
Claim · model-written summary
The Planrise combination yielded 3.4 t/ha.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- Planrisee6
- Outcome
- yielde5
- Value
- 3.4 t/hae6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean”
e6“The combination Planrise Strain bacterium АР-33 Pseudomonas fluorescens, 3 × 109 CFU/ cm3), 5 l/ha + 0.1% xymedon solution + 0.2% succinic acid solution + 2 ml DMAE + 2 ml DMSO. It was consisted of 3.4 t/ha”
e5“The yield increase recorded in 1.15—1.7 times in comparison with control by the results of biocomplexes usage with their fungicide, immunoprotective and stimulating action”
Claim · model-written summary
The Planrise combination gave 79.1% efficiency against late blight.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- Planrisee6
- Outcome
- efficiency against late blighte7
- Value
- 79.1%e7
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean”
e6“The combination Planrise Strain bacterium АР-33 Pseudomonas fluorescens, 3 × 109 CFU/ cm3), 5 l/ha + 0.1% xymedon solution + 0.2% succinic acid solution + 2 ml DMAE + 2 ml DMSO. It was consisted of 3.4 t/ha”
e7“The preparation’s efficiency against late blight consisted of 79.1%”
Claim · model-written summary
All biocomplex combinations showed efficiency of 67.3–88.1% against diseases.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- biocomplexes’ combinations usagee7
- Outcome
- efficiency against diseasese7
- Value
- 67.3—88.1%e7
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean”
e7“All biocomplexes’ combinations usage showed the preparations’ efficiency against diseases in scope 67.3—88.1%”
Claim · model-written summary
Adding DMAE and DMSO to biocomplexes increased preparation efficiency by 8–25% compared with combinations without them.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe1
- Treatment
- DMAE and DMSOe7
- Outcome
- preparations efficiencye7
- Direction
- increasee7
- Value
- 8—25%e7
- Comparator
- combinations without their usagee7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The best weight indexes 100 seeds and quantity of beans forming in soybean”
e7“The additional matters DMAE and DMSO (they have influence on transmembrane functions) usage allows to increase preparations efficiency on 8—25% in comparison with combinations without their usage”
The same questions in other papers
N,N-dimethylethanolamine · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
dimethyl sulfoxide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
succinic acid · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.