Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Farm Sciences

Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and quality of guava (Psidium guajava L)

Vivek Kumar; S Mukherjee; R Paliwal; et al.

4
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted at IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahan during 2017 and 2018. The experiment consisted of 24 treatment combinations comprising four levels of recommended dose of fertilizers, two levels of bio-fertilizers and three levels of micronutrients under factorial randomized block design with three replications. The results revealed that application of 125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4 significantly increased the vegetative parameters like plant height and plant spread (E-W and N-S). Significant increase in qualitative attributes like total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, total sugars, reducing sugar, sugar-acid ratio, pectin content and minimum acidity content were also recorded in the same treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 125% NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4% ZnSO4 significantly increased guava plant height and plant spread.

Treatment
125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4e1
Outcome
plant height and plant spreade1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Setting
IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“guava (Psidium guajava L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The field experiment was conducted at IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahan during 2017 and 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4 significantly increased the vegetative parameters like plant height and plant spread (E-W and N-S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination significantly increased guava total soluble solids, ascorbic acid and total sugars.

Treatment
125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4e1
Outcome
total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, total sugarse2
Direction
Significant increasee2
Setting
IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“guava (Psidium guajava L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The field experiment was conducted at IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahan during 2017 and 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4 significantly increased the vegetative parameters like plant height and plant spread (E-W and N-S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant increase in qualitative attributes like total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, total sugars, reducing sugar, sugar-acid ratio, pectin content and minimum acidity content were also recorded in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination significantly increased guava reducing sugar, sugar-acid ratio and pectin content.

Treatment
125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4e1
Outcome
reducing sugar, sugar-acid ratio, pectin contente2
Direction
Significant increasee2
Setting
IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“guava (Psidium guajava L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The field experiment was conducted at IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahan during 2017 and 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4 significantly increased the vegetative parameters like plant height and plant spread (E-W and N-S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant increase in qualitative attributes like total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, total sugars, reducing sugar, sugar-acid ratio, pectin content and minimum acidity content were also recorded in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave guava fruit with minimum acidity content.

Treatment
125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4e1
Outcome
minimum acidity contente2
Direction
minimume2
Setting
IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t1

“guava (Psidium guajava L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–91 · show in text ↑
e0

“The field experiment was conducted at IHITC, Jaipur, Rajastahan during 2017 and 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–84 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 125 per cent NPK, 50 g Azotobacter and 0.4 per cent ZnSO4 significantly increased the vegetative parameters like plant height and plant spread (E-W and N-S)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–526 · show in text ↑
e2

“Significant increase in qualitative attributes like total soluble solids, ascorbic acid, total sugars, reducing sugar, sugar-acid ratio, pectin content and minimum acidity content were also recorded in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–748 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Azotobacter · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 56 positive, 3 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.