Abstract
A field experiment was carried out with different treatment combinations of organic manures (FYM @ 25 and 50 kg, vermi-compost @ 5 kg and organic mulch 10 cm thick per plant), inorganic fertilizers (full dose of recommended NPK, 50% dose of recommended NPK), bio-fertilizers (Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Pseudomonas flourescence Aspergillus niger etc.) and foliar spray of micronutrients on eight-year-old guava trees cv. Sardar under high density planting. The results revealed that the application of 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp), reducing sugar (4.77%), total sugars (8.10%), leaf nitrogen (1.40%), phosphorus (0.46%), potassium (1.17%) contents and fruit yield (28.95 kg per plant). Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content of the leaf were positively correlated with fruit yield. Further, regression analysis revealed that fruit weight (r2 = 0.914) dominantly influenced the fruit yield and leaf nitrogen content also influenced (r2 = 0.499) fruit yield significantly. The combined application of 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) gave significantly higher fruit yield plant−1 (28.95kg) with higher B: C ratio (2.53:1).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
The combined NPK, FYM and Azotobacter treatment significantly increased guava canopy volume
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- canopy volumee1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 201.42 m3e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased guava fruit weight
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- fruit weighte1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 153.30 ge1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased guava TSS
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- TSSe1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 14%e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased guava ascorbic acid
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- ascorbic acide1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 198.30 mg/100 g pulpe1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased guava reducing sugar
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- reducing sugare1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 4.77%e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp), reducing sugar (4.77%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased guava total sugars
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- total sugarse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 8.10%e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp), reducing sugar (4.77%), total sugars (8.10%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased leaf nitrogen content of guava
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- leaf nitrogene1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 1.40%e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp), reducing sugar (4.77%), total sugars (8.10%), leaf nitrogen (1.40%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased leaf phosphorus content of guava
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- phosphoruse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 0.46%e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp), reducing sugar (4.77%), total sugars (8.10%), leaf nitrogen (1.40%), phosphorus (0.46%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased leaf potassium content of guava
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Organ / stage
- leafe1
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- potassiume1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 1.17%e1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp), reducing sugar (4.77%), total sugars (8.10%), leaf nitrogen (1.40%), phosphorus (0.46%), potassium (1.17%)”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment significantly increased guava fruit yield per plant
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Material
- cv. Sardart0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e1
- Outcome
- fruit yielde1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 28.95 kg per plante1
- Setting
- field experimente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e0“A field experiment was carried out”
e1“50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) significantly increased the canopy volume (201.42 m3), fruit weight (153.30 g), TSS (14%), ascorbic acid (198.30 mg/100 g pulp), reducing sugar (4.77%), total sugars (8.10%), leaf nitrogen (1.40%), phosphorus (0.46%), potassium (1.17%) contents and fruit yield (28.95 kg per plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents were positively correlated with guava fruit yield
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Organ / stage
- leafe2
- Outcome
- fruit yielde2
- Direction
- positively correlatede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e2“Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content of the leaf were positively correlated with fruit yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight explained guava fruit yield variation (r2 = 0.914) in regression analysis
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Organ / stage
- fruite3
- Outcome
- fruit yielde3
- Value
- r2 = 0.914e3
- Qualifier
- dominantlye3
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e3“regression analysis revealed that fruit weight (r2 = 0.914) dominantly influenced the fruit yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf nitrogen content significantly influenced guava fruit yield (r2 = 0.499)
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Organ / stage
- leafe4
- Outcome
- fruit yielde4
- Value
- r2 = 0.499e4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e4“leaf nitrogen content also influenced (r2 = 0.499) fruit yield significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined treatment gave a higher benefit-cost ratio of 2.53:1 in guava
- Taxon
- guavaPsidium guajavat0
- Treatment
- 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7)e5
- Outcome
- B: C ratioe5
- Direction
- highere5
- Value
- 2.53:1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“guava cv. Sardar”
e5“The combined application of 50 percent dose of recommended NPK + 50 kg FYM + 250 g Azotobacter (T7) gave significantly higher fruit yield plant−1 (28.95kg) with higher B: C ratio (2.53:1)”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Azotobacter · nutrient: content · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · quality: phytochemicals · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Azotobacter · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
19 papers more in this group
See all 23 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →fertilization · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.