Paper · 2022 · Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Fall-Planted Cover Crops for Weed Suppression in Western Kansas

S. Dhanda; V. Kumar; A. K. Obour; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The widespread evolution of herbicide-resistant (HR) kochia and Palmer amaranth warrants the use of alternative ecological-based strategies for weed management in no-tillage (NT) dryland cropping systems in western Kansas. A field study was established in the fall of 2020 at Kansas State University Agricultural Research Center near Hays, KS, to determine the impact of fall-planted cover crop (CC) mixture on 1) kochia and Palmer amaranth suppression (density and biomass reduction), and 2) Palmer amaranth emergence dynamics in subsequent grain sorghum. A CC mixture of winter triticale, winter pea, radish, and rapeseed was planted in wheat stubble in the fall of 2020. The CC mixture was terminated at triticale heading stage on May 26, 2021 by using 1) Roundup PowerMax (glyphosate) at 32 fl oz/a, and 2) Roundup PowerMax at 32 fl oz/a + Degree Xtra (premix of acetochlor + atrazine) at 2.2 quart/a. A chemical fallow treatment (without CC) was included for comparison. The study site was planted with grain sorghum hybrid ‘DKS 38-16’ on June 10, 2021. The CC mixture produced an average of 1360 lb/a aboveground biomass at the time of termination. The CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra had 98 and 95% less total weed density at 0 and 30 days after termination (DAT), respectively, compared to chemical fallow. No difference in weed density was observed at later evaluations. At grain sorghum harvest, CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax and Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra reduced total weed biomass by 61% and 73%, respectively, compared to chemical fallow. The time taken to reach 10, 50, and 90% cumulative emergence of Palmer amaranth was delayed by 9, 15, and 21 days, respectively, in CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax and 11, 39, and 128 days, respectively, in CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra when compared with chemical fallow. Grain sorghum yield did not differ between CC and chemical fallow treatments. These results suggest that a fall-planted CC mixture can play an important role for kochia and Palmer amaranth suppression in NT dryland crop production in western Kansas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cover crop mixture produced 1360 lb/a aboveground biomass at termination.

Taxon
CC mixturee0
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Value
1360 lb/ae0

Verbatim

e0

“The CC mixture produced an average of 1360 lb/a aboveground biomass at the time of termination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cover Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cover crop with Roundup PowerMax and Degree Xtra had 98% less weed density at termination than chemical fallow.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore7
Treatment
CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtrae0
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
98e0
Qualifier
0e0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra had 98 and 95% less total weed density at 0 and 30 days after termination (DAT), respectively, compared to chemical fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1331 · show in text ↑
e7

“planted with grain sorghum hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment had 95% less weed density 30 days after termination.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore7
Treatment
CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtrae0
Outcome
total weed densitye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
30 days after terminatione0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra had 98 and 95% less total weed density at 0 and 30 days after termination (DAT), respectively, compared to chemical fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1331 · show in text ↑
e7

“planted with grain sorghum hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1028 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density did not differ at later evaluations.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore7
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
No differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No difference in weed density was observed at later evaluations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1396 · show in text ↑
e7

“planted with grain sorghum hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop terminated with Roundup PowerMax reduced total weed biomass by 61% versus chemical fallow.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
CC terminated with Roundup PowerMaxe0
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
61%e0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At grain sorghum harvest, CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax and Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra reduced total weed biomass by 61% and 73%, respectively, compared to chemical fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crop terminated with Roundup PowerMax and Degree Xtra reduced weed biomass by 73%.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtrae0
Outcome
total weed biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
73%e0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At grain sorghum harvest, CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax and Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra reduced total weed biomass by 61% and 73%, respectively, compared to chemical fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1579 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PowerMax cover crop delayed 10%, 50%, and 90% Palmer amaranth emergence by 9, 15, and 21 days.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore7
Treatment
CC terminated with Roundup PowerMaxe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
cumulative emergence of Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
9, 15, and 21 dayse0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time taken to reach 10, 50, and 90% cumulative emergence of Palmer amaranth was delayed by 9, 15, and 21 days, respectively, in CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax and 11, 39, and 128 days, respectively, in CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra when compared with chemical fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1876 · show in text ↑
e7

“planted with grain sorghum hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PowerMax and Degree Xtra cover crop delayed 10%, 50%, and 90% Palmer amaranth emergence by 11, 39, and 128 days.

Taxon
grain sorghumSorghum bicolore7
Treatment
CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtrae0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
cumulative emergence of Palmer amaranthe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
11, 39, and 128 dayse0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time taken to reach 10, 50, and 90% cumulative emergence of Palmer amaranth was delayed by 9, 15, and 21 days, respectively, in CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax and 11, 39, and 128 days, respectively, in CC terminated with Roundup PowerMax + Degree Xtra when compared with chemical fallow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1876 · show in text ↑
e7

“planted with grain sorghum hybrid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain sorghum yield did not differ between cover crop and chemical fallow treatments.

Taxon
Grain sorghumSorghum bicolore0
Treatment
CCe0
Outcome
Grain sorghum yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
chemical fallowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain sorghum yield did not differ between CC and chemical fallow treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1878–1954 · show in text ↑

cover crop · weed · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cover crop · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cover crop · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.