Abstract
The present investigation was conducted to study the effect of nano fertilizer in the growth yield and quality of okra (Abelmoschus esculenthus). The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Ten different treatments were carried out with different combinations of fertilizers. The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix. The highest cost benefit ratio 3.59 was also observed in T2 (Soil application of 50% RDF as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed plant height of 120.21 cm among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- Okra
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 120.21 cme1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed number of leaves per plant of 83.99 among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- number of leaves per plante1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 83.99e1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed number of branches per plant of 3.62 among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- number of branches per plante1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 3.62e1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed days to first harvesting of 46.97 among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- days to first harvestinge1
- Value
- 46.97e1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed pod length of 12.72cm among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- pod lengthe1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 12.72cme1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed pod width of 1.65cm among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- pod widthe1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 1.65cme1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed number of pods per plant of 29.23 among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- number of pods per plante1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 29.23e1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed average of pod weight of 12.67g among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- average of pod weighte1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 12.67ge1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed pod yield per plant of 370.39g among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- pod yield per plante1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 370.39ge1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed pod yield per plot of 8.89kg among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- pod yield per plote1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 8.89kge1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed pod yield of 131.69q ha-1 among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- pod yielde1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 131.69q ha-1e1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 showed TSS of 2.930Brix among the NPK combinations.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- TSSe1
- Direction
- higherinferrede1
- Value
- 2.930Brixe1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
Claim · model-written summary
T2 had the highest cost benefit ratio (3.59).
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione2
- Outcome
- cost benefit ratioe2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 3.59e2
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e2“The highest cost benefit ratio 3.59 was also observed in T2 (Soil application of 50% RDF as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application)”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment T2 was the best of the NPK combinations for growth, yield attribute and quality parameters.
- Taxon
- OkraAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil applicatione1
- Outcome
- growth, yield attribute and quality parameterse1
- Direction
- the beste1
- Comparator
- all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPKe1
- Setting
- Pathanamthitta, Keralae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus)”
e0“The experiment was carried out at the instructional farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kerndra, Pathanamthitta, Kerala, during the year 2021”
e1“The result obtained with treatment T2 (Soil application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers as conventional fertilizer + 50% recommended dose of nano N as foliar application, nano P&K as soil application) was recorded the best among in all combination of conventional fertilizer NPK and nano NPK in term of growth, yield attribute and quality parameters like plant height 120.21 cm, number of leaves per plant 83.99, number of branches per plant 3.62, days to first harvesting 46.97, pod length 12.72cm, pod width 1.65cm, number of pods per plant 29.23, average of pod weight 12.67g, pod yield per plant 370.39g, pod yield per plot 8.89kg, pod yield 131.69q ha-1and TSS 2.930Brix”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results differ
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →nanoparticle · quality: sugar starch · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
nanoparticle · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
14 papers more in this group
See all 18 papers →application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
111 papers more in this group
See all 115 papers →phosphorus · quality: general · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · quality: sugar starch · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · quality: general · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.