Paper · 2022 · Acta agriculturae Slovenica

Influence of different sources of nitrogen fertilizer and weed control on yield, yield components and some qualitative traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under dryland conditions of Khorramabad

Sajad KORDI; Tayebeh DANAYE-TOUS; Soheila DASTBORHAN

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate yield, yield components, and some qualitative traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars under nitrogen fertilizers and weed control in dryland conditions of Khorramabad during the 2017 - 2018 growing season. Treatments were arranged in split-split-plot based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The main factor included F1: control (without fertilizer); F2: bio-fertilizer (Rhizobium); F3: 100 % chemical fertilizer and F4: integration of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer; sub-factor consisted of three cultivars of chickpea (Adel, Mansour, and Arman) and sub-sub-factor included weeds control (weeding) and weed infested (non-weeding). The results indicated that nitrogen fertilizers, especially the integration of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer, had a positive effect on all studied traits. The highest number of pods per plant, grain yield, and biological yield were obtained from the Arman cultivar with the application of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer and for the same cultivar under weed control conditions. The maximum number of pods per plant (28.2) and amount of grain protein content (25.3 %) were obtained by integrating of bio-fertilizer + 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer and weeds control. In general, the Arman cultivar has priority over other cultivars for the grain yield under Khorramabad climate conditions, and integration of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer could be considered as a means to reduce the consumption of chemical fertilizers for sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizers, especially combined biofertilizer and half-rate chemical fertilizer, benefited all studied chickpea traits.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integration of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
all studied traitse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizers, especially the integration of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer, had a positive effect on all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arman under combined biofertilizer and half-rate chemical fertilizer had the highest pod number, grain yield and biological yield.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Armane0
Treatment
bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizere0
Outcome
number of pods per plant, grain yield, and biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of pods per plant, grain yield, and biological yield were obtained from the Arman cultivar with the application of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arman under weed control had the highest pod number, grain yield and biological yield.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Armane0
Treatment
weed controle0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
number of pods per plant, grain yield, and biological yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest number of pods per plant, grain yield, and biological yield were obtained from the Arman cultivar with the application of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer and for the same cultivar under weed control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1124 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer and weed control produced 28.2 pods per plant.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrating of bio-fertilizer + 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer and weeds controle0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
28.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of pods per plant (28.2) and amount of grain protein content (25.3 %) were obtained by integrating of bio-fertilizer + 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer and weeds control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined fertilizer and weed control produced 25.3% grain protein content.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrating of bio-fertilizer + 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer and weeds controle0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
maximume0
Value
25.3 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum number of pods per plant (28.2) and amount of grain protein content (25.3 %) were obtained by integrating of bio-fertilizer + 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer and weeds control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1314 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors prioritize Arman for grain yield in Khorramabad.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Material
Armane0
Outcome
priority over other cultivars for the grain yielde0
Setting
Khorramabade0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Arman cultivar has priority over other cultivars for the grain yield under Khorramabad climate conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1437 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend combined biofertilizer and half-rate chemical fertilizer to reduce chemical fertilizer use.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome
integration of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integration of bio-fertilizer + 50 % chemical fertilizer could be considered as a means to reduce the consumption of chemical fertilizers for sustainable agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1608 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–158 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 112 positive, 9 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.