Paper · 2022 · Brazilian Journal of Experimental Design Data Analysis and Inferential Statistics

Effect of cassava starch biofilm with diffusion of silver nanoparticles on the conservation of banana 'prata'

Sérgio Thode Filho; Fernando Gomes de Souza Junior; Emanuele Nunes de Lima Figueiredo Jorge; et al.

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Brazil is now the world's fourth-largest banana producer in the world with an annual production of 6.953,747 tons per year. In Brazil, the banana (Musa spp.) stands out, not only because it is the most widespread, but also because it is the most consumed by all social classes. Cassava is a renewable, almost unlimited resource and one of the most abundant substances in nature. It is one of the most important starchy root crops of the tropics used for food and industrial purposes. The present study aimed to evaluate the use of biofilms based on cassava starch with the diffusion of silver nanoparticles (AgNP) on the conservation of banana 'Prata'. Initially, filmogenic solutions were produced using the casting technique for five treatments. Additionally, transparency, thickness, grammage, and, subsequently, the biofilms were applied in the film-forming solution for 1 min and suspended for further drying at room temperature. After this process, were evaluated the fresh mass loss and total soluble solids. This study revealed the efficiency of cassava starch biofilm with gelatin addition to reduce the enzymatic browning rate and increase the shelf life of bananas (Musa Subgroup Prata). However, no significant results were observed with the addition of commercial silver nanoparticles .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava starch biofilm with gelatin reduced banana enzymatic browning.

Taxon
bananase0
Material
Musa Subgroup Pratae0
Treatment
cassava starch biofilm with gelatin additione0
Outcome
enzymatic browning ratee0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cassava starch biofilm with gelatin addition to reduce the enzymatic browning rate and increase the shelf life of bananas (Musa Subgroup Prata).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava starch biofilm with gelatin increased banana shelf life.

Taxon
bananase0
Material
Musa Subgroup Pratae0
Treatment
cassava starch biofilm with gelatin additione0
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cassava starch biofilm with gelatin addition to reduce the enzymatic browning rate and increase the shelf life of bananas (Musa Subgroup Prata).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1198 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding commercial silver nanoparticles gave no significant result for banana conservation.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
addition of commercial silver nanoparticlese0
Outcome
conservation of banana 'prata't0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“no significant results were observed with the addition of commercial silver nanoparticles .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“conservation of banana 'prata'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–109 · show in text ↑

Manihot esculenta · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

gelatin · physiology: enzyme activity · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

gelatin · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.