Paper · 2022 · ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice

Growth and yield of some promising Egyptian rice genotypes under foliar application of different stimulating compounds

A A E Mohamed; S Gh R Sorour; T F Metwally; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The Effects of foliar application of different stimulating compounds on the growth and yield of three promising Egyptian rice genotypes were studied in a field experiments at the Experimental Farm of Rice Research and Training Center (RRTC), Egypt, during consecutive rice seasons 2018 and 2019. Three rice Egyptian genotypes (Sakha108, GZ9399, and GZ10154) were tested under different stimulating compounds like Ascobine (13% citric acid, 25% ascorbic acid plus 62% organic materials), humic acid (65% humic acid +10% K2O), Amino acid (27.38 % mixed amino acid + 9% micronutrients + 2% magnesium), vulvic acid (50% Vulvic acid + 20% organic acid), N:P:K::20:20:20 and potassium sulphate (50% K2O) The growth characteristics like number of tillers, chlorophyll content, leaf area and dry matter accumulation at 30 and 45 days after transplanting were determined . Number of panicles m-2, panicle length, panicle weight, 1000-grain weight, number of filled grains per panicle, number of unfilled grains per panicle, grain yield and straw yield were studied at harvest. There were significant variations among the studied genotypes in terms of the studied characteristics like (chlorophyll content and grain yield). The foliar application of stimulating compounds significantly increased growth, yield and yield components of the studied rice genotypes. There were significant differences among the response of the studied genotypes to the application of the stimulating compounds. Application of amino acid to Sakha108 recorded the highest grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice genotypes differed significantly in chlorophyll content and grain yield.

Outcome
chlorophyll content and grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were significant variations among the studied genotypes in terms of the studied characteristics like (chlorophyll content and grain yield).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar stimulating compounds significantly increased rice growth, yield, and yield components.

Treatment
foliar application of stimulating compoundse0
Outcome
growth, yield and yield componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“The foliar application of stimulating compounds significantly increased growth, yield and yield components of the studied rice genotypes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1351 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice genotypes differed significantly in their response to stimulating compounds.

Treatment
application of the stimulating compoundse0
Outcome
response of the studied genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were significant differences among the response of the studied genotypes to the application of the stimulating compounds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid applied to Sakha108 gave the highest grain yield.

Material
Sakha108e0
Treatment
Application of amino acide0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Egyptian rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of amino acid to Sakha108 recorded the highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1480–1551 · show in text ↑

amino acid · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.