Paper · 2022 · Environment Conservation Journal

Agroforestry: Viable alternatives for ensuring green fodder production around the year

Sneh Yadav; R. S. Dhillon; K.S. Ahlawat; et al.

18
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Agroforestry is an integration of tree species with agricultural crops or livestock that can be directly used to enhance agro biodiversity, rural livelihood and to meet the demand of green fodder throughout the year. Considering this fact, a study was done at Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana to assess the productivity of fodder crops under poplar based agroforestry system. In February 2016, poplar was planted in six different spacing of 3× 3 m, 4×3 m, 5×3 m, 6×3 m, 7×3 m and 8×3 m. In this study, fodder crops (sorghum during Kharif season and oat and berseem during Rabi season) were intercropped in different spacing’s of poplar and compared with control in three replications. The results revealed that the maximum DBH (13.92 cm), basal diameter (16.90 cm) and crown spread (6.79 m) attained in 8×3 m spacing while maximum height (9.61 m) is attained in 3×3 m spacing. The highest pH (7.94) and EC (0.27 dS/m) were recorded in 8×3 m spacing while highest SOC (0.47 %), N (158.5 kg/ha), P (16.8 kg/ha) and K (343.8 kg/ha) were recorded in 3×3 m spacing. Green fodder biomass of sorghum (38.45 t/ha), berseem (64.56 t/ha) and oat (52.62 t/ha) was recorded higher in wider spacing (8×3 m) as compared to sole crops. The maximum light intensity (672.4 Lux) was recorded in 8×3 m at 1.00 pm in the month of July, 2018. Higher value of BCR was observed for poplar with oat (2.44) followed by poplar with sorghum (2.31) and poplar with berseem (2.28) under 3×3 m spacing indicating that closer spacing of 3×3 m of poplar is more economic than the other spacings due to more number of trees per unit area and more production of wood.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar DBH reached a maximum of 13.92 cm at 8×3 m spacing.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
DBHe0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13.92 cme0
Setting
8×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the maximum DBH (13.92 cm), basal diameter (16.90 cm) and crown spread (6.79 m) attained in 8×3 m spacing while maximum height (9.61 m) is attained in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar basal diameter reached a maximum of 16.90 cm at 8×3 m spacing.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
basal diametere0
Direction
maximume0
Value
16.90 cme0
Setting
8×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the maximum DBH (13.92 cm), basal diameter (16.90 cm) and crown spread (6.79 m) attained in 8×3 m spacing while maximum height (9.61 m) is attained in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar crown spread reached a maximum of 6.79 m at 8×3 m spacing.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
crown spreade0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6.79 me0
Setting
8×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the maximum DBH (13.92 cm), basal diameter (16.90 cm) and crown spread (6.79 m) attained in 8×3 m spacing while maximum height (9.61 m) is attained in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar height reached a maximum of 9.61 m at 3×3 m spacing.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
9.61 me0
Setting
3×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that the maximum DBH (13.92 cm), basal diameter (16.90 cm) and crown spread (6.79 m) attained in 8×3 m spacing while maximum height (9.61 m) is attained in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH was highest at 8×3 m spacing, reaching 7.94.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.94e0
Setting
8×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pH (7.94) and EC (0.27 dS/m) were recorded in 8×3 m spacing while highest SOC (0.47 %), N (158.5 kg/ha), P (16.8 kg/ha) and K (343.8 kg/ha) were recorded in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil EC was highest at 8×3 m spacing, reaching 0.27 dS/m.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.27 dS/me0
Setting
8×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pH (7.94) and EC (0.27 dS/m) were recorded in 8×3 m spacing while highest SOC (0.47 %), N (158.5 kg/ha), P (16.8 kg/ha) and K (343.8 kg/ha) were recorded in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil SOC was highest at 3×3 m spacing, reaching 0.47 %.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
SOCe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.47 %e0
Setting
3×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pH (7.94) and EC (0.27 dS/m) were recorded in 8×3 m spacing while highest SOC (0.47 %), N (158.5 kg/ha), P (16.8 kg/ha) and K (343.8 kg/ha) were recorded in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N was highest at 3×3 m spacing, reaching 158.5 kg/ha.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
158.5 kg/hae0
Setting
3×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pH (7.94) and EC (0.27 dS/m) were recorded in 8×3 m spacing while highest SOC (0.47 %), N (158.5 kg/ha), P (16.8 kg/ha) and K (343.8 kg/ha) were recorded in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil P was highest at 3×3 m spacing, reaching 16.8 kg/ha.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.8 kg/hae0
Setting
3×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pH (7.94) and EC (0.27 dS/m) were recorded in 8×3 m spacing while highest SOC (0.47 %), N (158.5 kg/ha), P (16.8 kg/ha) and K (343.8 kg/ha) were recorded in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil K was highest at 3×3 m spacing, reaching 343.8 kg/ha.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
Ke0
Direction
higheste0
Value
343.8 kg/hae0
Setting
3×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest pH (7.94) and EC (0.27 dS/m) were recorded in 8×3 m spacing while highest SOC (0.47 %), N (158.5 kg/ha), P (16.8 kg/ha) and K (343.8 kg/ha) were recorded in 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sorghum green fodder biomass was higher under wider poplar spacing than as a sole crop, reaching 38.45 t/ha.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
wider spacing (8×3 m)e0
Outcome
Green fodder biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
38.45 t/hae0
Comparator
sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green fodder biomass of sorghum (38.45 t/ha), berseem (64.56 t/ha) and oat (52.62 t/ha) was recorded higher in wider spacing (8×3 m) as compared to sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

berseem green fodder biomass was higher under wider poplar spacing than as a sole crop, reaching 64.56 t/ha.

Taxon
berseeme0
Treatment
wider spacing (8×3 m)e0
Outcome
Green fodder biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
64.56 t/hae0
Comparator
sole cropse0

Verbatim

e0

“Green fodder biomass of sorghum (38.45 t/ha), berseem (64.56 t/ha) and oat (52.62 t/ha) was recorded higher in wider spacing (8×3 m) as compared to sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

oat green fodder biomass was higher under wider poplar spacing than as a sole crop, reaching 52.62 t/ha.

Treatment
wider spacing (8×3 m)e0
Outcome
Green fodder biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
52.62 t/hae0
Comparator
sole cropse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green fodder biomass of sorghum (38.45 t/ha), berseem (64.56 t/ha) and oat (52.62 t/ha) was recorded higher in wider spacing (8×3 m) as compared to sole crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1257 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light intensity reached a maximum of 672.4 Lux in 8×3 m spacing at 1.00 pm in July 2018.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse1
Outcome
light intensitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
672.4 Luxe0
Qualifier
at 1.00 pm in the month of July, 2018e0
Setting
8×3 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum light intensity (672.4 Lux) was recorded in 8×3 m at 1.00 pm in the month of July, 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“poplar was planted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar with oat had a BCR of 2.44 under 3×3 m spacing.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
2.44e0
Qualifier
oate0
Setting
3×3 m spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher value of BCR was observed for poplar with oat (2.44) followed by poplar with sorghum (2.31) and poplar with berseem (2.28) under 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar with sorghum had a BCR of 2.31 under 3×3 m spacing.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
2.31e0
Qualifier
sorghume0
Setting
3×3 m spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher value of BCR was observed for poplar with oat (2.44) followed by poplar with sorghum (2.31) and poplar with berseem (2.28) under 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poplar with berseem had a BCR of 2.28 under 3×3 m spacing.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
BCRe0
Direction
Highere0
Value
2.28e0
Qualifier
berseeme0
Setting
3×3 m spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher value of BCR was observed for poplar with oat (2.44) followed by poplar with sorghum (2.31) and poplar with berseem (2.28) under 3×3 m spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1509 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 3×3 m poplar spacing was more economic than other spacings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
closer spacing of 3×3 m of poplar is more economic than the other spacingse0
Qualifier
more number of trees per unit area and more production of woode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“closer spacing of 3×3 m of poplar is more economic than the other spacings due to more number of trees per unit area and more production of wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1670 · show in text ↑

density · growth · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

density · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

34 papers: 22 positive, 12 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.