Paper · 2022 · Egyptian Journal of Chemistry

Reducing chemical fertilizers partially by using natural alternative sources of organic fertilizers and its impact on “Hass” avocado trees.

Eman A.A. Abd El-Moniem; A.Y.I. Thabet; Adel M.R.A. Abdelaziz; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was conducted on avocado trees (Persea americana, Mill.) “Hass” cv. during 2020/2021 seasons in a private orchard located at El-Nubaria region, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt. It was an attempt to substitute chemical fertilizers (CF) such as N, P, K and Mg with organic fertilizers such as compost (COM) and natural fertilizer sources (NFS) followed by a study of its impact on vegetative growth, yield, fruit quality, and nutritional status. Organic fertilizer was used alone or in combination with CF to fulfill the requirements of each tree. It contains an identical amount of compost (20 kg/tree) in combination with four levels of NFS to cover 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of the tree's requirements. Considering that, the natural fertilizer sources (NFS) were granulated organic N fertilizer and natural raw rocky materials for P, K and Mg. The previous treatments were compared with 100% mineral recommended doses of N, P, K and Mg (control). Results indicated that mineral fertilization significantly improved values of all tested properties compared with all treatments in both seasons of the study with no significant differences between it and 50% organic fertilizer (20kg COM+NFS) + 50% CF treatment in the 2nd season with regard to the following traits (shoot length, shoot number/branch, fruit weight and pulp weight).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Full mineral fertilization significantly improved all tested avocado properties compared with the other treatments in both seasons.

Taxon
avocado treesPersea americanat0
Treatment
mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
all tested propertiese0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both seasons of the studye0
Comparator
all treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mineral fertilization significantly improved values of all tested properties compared with all treatments in both seasons of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“Reducing chemical fertilizers partially by using natural alternative sources of organic fertilizers and its impact on “Hass” avocado trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second season, full mineral fertilization and the half organic plus half chemical treatment did not differ significantly for shoot length and shoot number per branch.

Taxon
avocado treesPersea americanat0
Treatment
50% organic fertilizer (20kg COM+NFS) + 50% CF treatmente0
Outcome
shoot length, shoot number/branche0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
2nd seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences between it and 50% organic fertilizer (20kg COM+NFS) + 50% CF treatment in the 2nd season with regard to the following traits (shoot length, shoot number/branch, fruit weight and pulp weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Reducing chemical fertilizers partially by using natural alternative sources of organic fertilizers and its impact on “Hass” avocado trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second season, full mineral fertilization and the half organic plus half chemical treatment did not differ significantly for fruit weight and pulp weight.

Taxon
avocado treesPersea americanat0
Treatment
50% organic fertilizer (20kg COM+NFS) + 50% CF treatmente0
Outcome
fruit weight and pulp weighte0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
2nd seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant differences between it and 50% organic fertilizer (20kg COM+NFS) + 50% CF treatment in the 2nd season with regard to the following traits (shoot length, shoot number/branch, fruit weight and pulp weight)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Reducing chemical fertilizers partially by using natural alternative sources of organic fertilizers and its impact on “Hass” avocado trees.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–139 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Persea americana (avocado)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · yield · Persea americana (avocado)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.