Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Effect of Eucalyptus-Wood-Based Compost Application Rates on Avocado (Persea americana Mill) Foliar Nutrient Content and Fruit Yield

Mmatshaka Phillimon Mohale; Alen Manyevere; Cosmas Parwada; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Background: The effects of different fertilizer types and their application rates on leaf nutrient content and avocado yield are unclear. An evaluation of eucalyptus-wood-based compost applied at 0, 5, 10, and 15 t ha−1 year−1 on foliar nutrient content, yield, and fruit size distribution (%) was completed at Mooketsi and Politsi, Limpopo Province, South Africa, from 2016 to 2018. Methods: A completely randomized block design with three replicates was used. Data were collected annually, and fruit size was classified as classes; 1 (>275 g), 2 (197–274 g), 3 (148–196 g), and 4 (0–147 g). Results: Leaf N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Na, Cu, and Zn, fruit yield and size distribution (%) were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by compost quantity and proportionally increased with application rates in each year. Compost had cumulative effects on the measured parameters; the highest values were recorded in 2018 under a 15 t ha−1 application rate, which corresponded to the highest yield (19.6 t ha−1) and the largest proportion of fruits in class 1. Conclusions: The ≥10 t ha−1 year−1 application rate can be used, though the compost saturation levels of the soils should be determined to avoid possible danger of nutrient toxicity if high application rates are continuously used for >3 years.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing compost rates significantly raised foliar nutrient content.

Taxon
AvocadoPersea americanat0
Treatment
compost quantitye0
Outcome
Leaf N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Na, Cu, and Zne0
Direction
proportionally increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Na, Cu, and Zn, fruit yield and size distribution (%) were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by compost quantity and proportionally increased with application rates in each year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Avocado (Persea americana Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing compost rates significantly raised fruit yield.

Taxon
AvocadoPersea americanat0
Treatment
compost quantitye0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
proportionally increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and size distribution (%) were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by compost quantity and proportionally increased with application rates in each year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Avocado (Persea americana Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing compost rates significantly increased fruit size distribution.

Taxon
AvocadoPersea americanat0
Treatment
compost quantitye0
Outcome
size distribution (%)e0
Direction
proportionally increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit yield and size distribution (%) were significantly (p < 0.05) affected by compost quantity and proportionally increased with application rates in each year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–810 · show in text ↑
t0

“Avocado (Persea americana Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield was 19.6 t ha−1 under the highest application rate in 2018.

Taxon
AvocadoPersea americanat0
Treatment
15 t ha−1 application ratee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
19.6 t ha−1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values were recorded in 2018 under a 15 t ha−1 application rate, which corresponded to the highest yield (19.6 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Avocado (Persea americana Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest compost rate in 2018 gave the largest class 1 fruit proportion.

Taxon
AvocadoPersea americanat0
Treatment
15 t ha−1 application ratee0
Outcome
proportion of fruits in class 1e0
Direction
largeste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest values were recorded in 2018 under a 15 t ha−1 application rate, which corresponded to the highest yield (19.6 t ha−1) and the largest proportion of fruits in class 1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Avocado (Persea americana Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

An application rate of at least 10 t ha−1 year−1 is recommended with soil saturation monitoring.

Taxon
AvocadoPersea americanat0
Outcome
≥10 t ha−1 year−1 application rate can be usede0
Qualifier
compost saturation levels of the soils should be determinede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Persea americana
Persea americana · TaxonB.navez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ≥10 t ha−1 year−1 application rate can be used, though the compost saturation levels of the soils should be determined to avoid possible danger of nutrient toxicity if high application rates are continuously used for >3 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1293 · show in text ↑
t0

“Avocado (Persea americana Mill)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–92 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Persea americana (avocado)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · growth · Persea americana (avocado)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · yield · Persea americana (avocado)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.