Paper · 2022 · Legume Research - An International Journal

Evaluation of Nano Zinc Effect on Performance of Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)

K. Saha; M. Mahato; M. Dey; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background: Considering the higher efficiency of nano fertilizers than chemical ones, the current study on nano Zn was undertaken to evaluate its effects on growth, yield, uptake and economics over other Zn sources on lentil. Methods: Field experiment was carried out during rabi seasons of 2019-20 and 2020-21 at the Instructional Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India with seven treatments using different sources of Zn through foliar and soil application in randomised block design replicated thrice. Zn uptake was calculated after testing Zn concentration through wet digestion followed by atomic absorption spectrophotometer determination of collected samples. Result: Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics. This treatment produced 29.34% and 30.33% more seed and stover respectively than without Zn application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray significantly increased plant height in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5)e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray significantly increased LAI in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5)e0
Outcome
LAIe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray significantly increased dry matter accumulation in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5)e0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray significantly increased 1000 seed weight in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5)e0
Outcome
1000 seed weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray significantly increased number and dry weight of nodules plant-1 in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5)e0
Outcome
number and dry weight of nodules plant-1e0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray significantly increased uptake of Zn in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5)e0
Outcome
uptake of Zne0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray significantly increased economics in lentil.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5)e0
Outcome
economicse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“Pooled result of the experiment revealed that foliar spray of nano Zn @ 20 ppm at 30 and 50 DAS (T5) resulted significantly higher plant height, LAI, dry matter accumulation, 1000 seed weight, number and dry weight of nodules plant-1, uptake of Zn, economics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray raised lentil seed yield by 29.34% over no zinc.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
seede0
Direction
moree0
Value
29.34%e0
Comparator
without Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“This treatment produced 29.34% and 30.33% more seed and stover respectively than without Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano zinc foliar spray raised lentil stover yield by 30.33% over no zinc.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
moree0
Value
30.33%e0
Comparator
without Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 · show in text ↑
e0

“This treatment produced 29.34% and 30.33% more seed and stover respectively than without Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1065 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

37 papers: 36 positive, 1 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

zinc atom · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

nanoparticle · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.