Paper · 2014 · Egyptian Journal of Horticulture

Increasing Nitrogen Efficiency by Humic Acid Soil Application to Squash Plants (Cucurbita pepo L.) Grown in Newly Reclaimed Saline Soil

T El-Masry; A Osman; Tolba; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

TWO FILED seasons were conducted during the summer seasons of 2010 and 2011 in the Experimental Farm at Demo, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, to increase nitrogen efficiency (ammonium nitrate 33.5% N, 150, 200, 250 and 300 kg fed-1) under three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1, in addition to the untreated as control to squash plants (Cucurbita pepo L.) (cv. Amjjed hybrid) grown in newly reclaimed saline soil.. In comparison with control, all other rates significantly increased vegetative growth plant characters ( i.e. number of leaves plant-1, stem length, total leaf area plant-1, leaf area leaf-1 and also, leaves, stem and canopy dry weight plant-1) as well as fruit yield and its components (i.e. number of fruits plant-1, yield plant-1 and total yield of fruits fed-1) except average of fruit weight. In addition, the concentrations of N, P and K % in leaves were increased, and Na and Cl were decreased. The same results were obtained with all nitrogen fertilizer rates, 200, 250 and 300 kg ammonium nitrate fed-1 as compared to the 150 kg fed-1 with some exceptions, P% was not affected and K% was decreased with increasing the rate of nitrogen. In view of the above mentioned results, it has been concluded that the efficiency of nitrogen fertilization increased with soil application of humic acid reflected on the growth and chemical composition and yield of squash (cv. Amjjed hybrid), and was the best treatment: the water solution of humic acid (1.5gL -1), with nitrogen fertilizer (250 kg) ammonium nitrate fed-1 where given a significant increase of total squash fruits yield fed-1 grown in newly reclaimed saline soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid rates increased squash vegetative growth traits relative to untreated control.

Taxon
squash plantse1
Material
cv. Amjjed hybride1
Treatment
three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1e1
Outcome
vegetative growth plant characterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated as controle1

Verbatim

e0

“all other rates significantly increased vegetative growth plant characters ( i.e. number of leaves plant-1, stem length, total leaf area plant-1, leaf area leaf-1 and also, leaves, stem and canopy dry weight plant-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1, in addition to the untreated as control to squash plants (Cucurbita pepo L.) (cv. Amjjed hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid rates increased squash fruit yield and its components, except average fruit weight, relative to untreated control.

Taxon
squash plantse1
Treatment
three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1e1
Outcome
fruit yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
except average of fruit weighte0
Comparator
untreated as controle1

Verbatim

e0

“all other rates significantly increased vegetative growth plant characters ( i.e. number of leaves plant-1, stem length, total leaf area plant-1, leaf area leaf-1 and also, leaves, stem and canopy dry weight plant-1) as well as fruit yield and its components (i.e. number of fruits plant-1, yield plant-1 and total yield of fruits fed-1) except average of fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–857 · show in text ↑
e1

“three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1, in addition to the untreated as control to squash plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased leaf N, P and K concentrations.

Taxon
squash plantse1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1e1
Outcome
concentrations of N, P and K % in leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
untreated as controle1

Verbatim

e0

“the concentrations of N, P and K % in leaves were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–931 · show in text ↑
e1

“three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1, in addition to the untreated as control to squash plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid decreased leaf Na and Cl concentrations.

Taxon
squash plantse1
Treatment
three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1e1
Outcome
Na and Cle0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated as controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Na and Cl were decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–961 · show in text ↑
e1

“three concentrations of humic acid as water solution 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5gL-1, in addition to the untreated as control to squash plants (Cucurbita pepo L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer rates of 200, 250 and 300 kg ammonium nitrate per fed increased squash growth and yield relative to 150 kg per fed.

Taxon
squashe1
Treatment
200, 250 and 300 kg ammonium nitrate fed-1e0
Outcome
growth and chemical composition and yielde1
Comparator
150 kg fed-1e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The same results were obtained with all nitrogen fertilizer rates, 200, 250 and 300 kg ammonium nitrate fed-1 as compared to the 150 kg fed-1 with some exceptions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and chemical composition and yield of squash (cv. Amjjed hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate did not affect leaf P percentage.

Taxon
squashe2
Treatment
200, 250 and 300 kg ammonium nitrate fed-1e1
Outcome
P%e0
Direction
not affectede0
Comparator
150 kg fed-1e1

Verbatim

e0

“P% was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1146 · show in text ↑
e1

“with all nitrogen fertilizer rates, 200, 250 and 300 kg ammonium nitrate fed-1 as compared to the 150 kg fed-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield of squash (cv. Amjjed hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate decreased leaf K percentage.

Taxon
squashe2
Treatment
increasing the rate of nitrogene0
Outcome
K%e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
150 kg fed-1e1

Verbatim

e0

“K% was decreased with increasing the rate of nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1204 · show in text ↑
e1

“with all nitrogen fertilizer rates, 200, 250 and 300 kg ammonium nitrate fed-1 as compared to the 150 kg fed-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104 · show in text ↑
e2

“yield of squash (cv. Amjjed hybrid)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1448 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid at 1.5gL -1 with 250 kg ammonium nitrate per fed gave the best significant total squash fruit yield.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
the water solution of humic acid (1.5gL -1), with nitrogen fertilizer (250 kg) ammonium nitrate fed-1e0
Outcome
total squash fruits yield fed-1e0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
newly reclaimed saline soile0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the best treatment: the water solution of humic acid (1.5gL -1), with nitrogen fertilizer (250 kg) ammonium nitrate fed-1 where given a significant increase of total squash fruits yield fed-1 grown in newly reclaimed saline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1686 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 42 positive, 9 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

other · growth · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.