Paper · 2011 · Pest Management Science

Soil amendments with Brassica cover crops for management of Phytophthora blight on squash

Pingsheng Ji; Daouda Koné; Jingfang Yin; et al.

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
35
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Phytophthora blight induced by Phytophthora capsici is responsible for serious yield loss in vegetable production in the United States and other countries. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Brassica cover crops used as soil amendments for managing Phytophthora blight of squash. RESULTS: In greenhouse studies, disease incidence on squash plants was significantly reduced by soil amendment with mustard shoots or roots used at 1 and 2.5% (plant tissue/soil, w/w). The shoots of canola used at 1 or 2.5% also suppressed disease, while the roots of canola or other crops did not reduce disease significantly. In field studies, soil amendments with mustard and canola provided the greatest disease reduction and increased squash yield significantly compared with the non-treated control. Mustard and canola did not appear to be susceptible to P. capsici. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that some Brassica crops, particularly mustard and canola, had the potential to significantly reduce Phytophthora blight on squash when used as soil amendments. As P. capsici has a remarkable ability to develop resistance to chemical fungicides, use of effective Brassica cover crops could be a biorational alternative to fungicides and a valuable component in developing integrated disease management programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard shoots or roots at 1 and 2.5% significantly reduced squash disease incidence in greenhouse studies.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
soil amendment with mustard shoots or roots used at 1 and 2.5% (plant tissue/soil, w/w)e0
Interactor
PhytophthoraPhytophthorat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence on squash plantse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
greenhouse studiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In greenhouse studies, disease incidence on squash plants was significantly reduced by soil amendment with mustard shoots or roots used at 1 and 2.5% (plant tissue/soil, w/w).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora blight on squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola shoots at 1 or 2.5% suppressed squash disease.

Taxon
squasht0
Treatment
shoots of canola used at 1 or 2.5%e0
Interactor
PhytophthoraPhytophthorat0pathogen
Outcome
Phytophthora blightt0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shoots of canola used at 1 or 2.5% also suppressed disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora blight on squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola roots and roots of other crops did not significantly reduce squash disease.

Taxon
squasht0
Treatment
roots of canola or other cropse0
Interactor
PhytophthoraPhytophthorat0pathogen
Outcome
Phytophthora blightt0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the roots of canola or other crops did not reduce disease significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora blight on squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field mustard and canola amendments gave the greatest squash disease reduction versus untreated control.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
soil amendments with mustard and canolae0
Interactor
PhytophthoraPhytophthorat0pathogen
Outcome
Phytophthora blightt0
Direction
greatest disease reductione0
Comparator
non-treated controle0
Setting
field studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In field studies, soil amendments with mustard and canola provided the greatest disease reduction and increased squash yield significantly compared with the non-treated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora blight on squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field mustard and canola amendments significantly increased squash yield versus untreated control.

Taxon
squashe0
Treatment
soil amendments with mustard and canolae0
Outcome
squash yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-treated controle0
Setting
field studiese0

Verbatim

e0

“In field studies, soil amendments with mustard and canola provided the greatest disease reduction and increased squash yield significantly compared with the non-treated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mustard and canola did not appear susceptible to P. capsici.

Taxon
Mustard and canolae0
Interactor
P. capsiciPhytophthora capsicie0pathogen
Outcome
did not appear to be susceptiblee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora capsici
Phytophthora capsici · InteractorElsa Paderes, Landcare Research NZ Ltd. · CC BY 3.0 nz · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mustard and canola did not appear to be susceptible to P. capsici.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–882 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest effective Brassica cover crops as a fungicide alternative in integrated squash disease management.

Taxon
squasht0
Outcome
biorational alternative to fungicidese0

Verbatim

e0

“use of effective Brassica cover crops could be a biorational alternative to fungicides and a valuable component in developing integrated disease management programs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1328 · show in text ↑
t0

“Phytophthora blight on squash”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–89 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Cucurbita (pumpkins)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.