Paper · 2018 · International journal of agricultural and biological engineering

Osmotic adjustment and up-regulation expression of stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization

Tingting Chang; Yujie Zhang; Huilian Xu; et al.

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
15
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Concerns about the soil salinity caused by excessive fertilization have prompted scientists to clarify the detailed mechanisms and find techniques to alleviate the damage caused by this kind of soil salinity. Aims of this study were to elucidate the effect of soil salinity caused by nitrate fertilization and the differences in salinity effect between nitrate salts and NaCl salt with analyses at various levels of crop physiology and molecular biology. A microbial inoculation was also tried to verify whether it could alleviate the salinity-induced loss and damages. In three experiments (Exp I, II and III), nitrate salts (NS) of Ca(NO3)2 and KNO3 were applied to potted tomato plants to simulate the soil salinity caused by fertilization and a microbial inoculant (MI) was applied. Photosynthesis was measured using Li-6400. Osmotic adjustment was analyzed using the mathematically modeled pressure-volume curve; O2- concentration and activity of SOD and nitrate reductase were measured. Expression of nitrate reductase gene and the stress-responsive gene DREB2 was analyzed using the real-time PCR method. In Exp I and II, where the applied NS amount was moderate, NS application at low concentration induced increases in O2- and MDA concentrations and plants acclimated to the soil salinity as the treatment prolonged for weeks. The acclimation was contributed by osmotic adjustment, activation of SOD and re-compartmentation of cell water between symplasm and apoplasm. These adjustments might be ultimately attributed to up-regulation of stress-responsive genes such as DREB2 as well as the nitrate reductase (NR) gene. However, in Exp III, applications of NaCl and NS at high concentration could not show positive effects as NS did. Application of MI synergistically increased the xerophytophysiological regulation caused by NS and alleviated the salinity damage in addition to its own positive effects on the tomato plants. Different from NaCl, nitrate salts at low application rate increased the total biomass and fruit yield of tomato and induced up-regulation expression of stress-responsive genes and the consequent active osmotic adjustment. However, nitrate application at high level negatively affected tomato plants irrespective of the gene up-regulations. Application of MI alleviated the salinity damage and synergistically increased the xerophytophysiological regulation caused by the soil salinity in addition to its positive effects on the tomato crop but the detailed mechanisms needed to be clarified in future further studies. Keywords: nitrate fertilizer, osmotic adjustment, salinity stress, soil salinization, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum); xerophytophysiology, microorganism, bioremediation DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20181103.2952 Citation: Chang T T, Zhang Y J, Xu H L, Shao X H, Xu Q C, Li F L, et al. Osmotic adjustment and up-regulation expression of stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2018; 11(3): 126–136.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-concentration nitrate salt application in Exp I and II increased O2- and MDA concentrations in tomato under soil salinity.

Treatment
NS application at low concentratione0
Outcome
O2- and MDA concentrationse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
where the applied NS amount was moderatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“where the applied NS amount was moderate, NS application at low concentration induced increases in O2- and MDA concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–145 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato plants acclimated to soil salinity as the low-concentration nitrate salt treatment prolonged for weeks.

Treatment
NS application at low concentratione0
Outcome
plants acclimated to the soil salinitye1
Qualifier
as the treatment prolonged for weekse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–145 · show in text ↑
e0

“NS application at low concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1206 · show in text ↑
e1

“plants acclimated to the soil salinity as the treatment prolonged for weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1334 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimation of tomato to soil salinity was contributed by osmotic adjustment, activation of SOD and re-compartmentation of cell water between symplasm and apoplasm.

Gene
SODe2
Outcome
acclimatione2
Qualifier
osmotic adjustmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“The acclimation was contributed by osmotic adjustment, activation of SOD and re-compartmentation of cell water between symplasm and apoplasm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1476 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acclimation adjustments may be attributed to up-regulation of the stress-responsive gene DREB2 and the nitrate reductase gene.

Gene
DREB2e3
Outcome
adjustmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–145 · show in text ↑
e3

“These adjustments might be ultimately attributed to up-regulation of stress-responsive genes such as DREB2 as well as the nitrate reductase (NR) gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applications of NaCl and high-concentration nitrate salt did not show positive effects on tomato, unlike low-concentration nitrate salt.

Treatment
applications of NaCl and NS at high concentratione4
Outcome
positive effectse4
Comparator
NSe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–145 · show in text ↑
e4

“in Exp III, applications of NaCl and NS at high concentration could not show positive effects as NS did”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1638–1741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of the microbial inoculant synergistically increased the xerophytophysiological regulation caused by nitrate salt in tomato.

Treatment
Application of MIe5
Interactor
microbial inoculante6symbiont
Outcome
xerophytophysiological regulatione5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–145 · show in text ↑
e5

“Application of MI synergistically increased the xerophytophysiological regulation caused by NS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1743–1837 · show in text ↑
e6

“a microbial inoculant (MI) was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of the microbial inoculant alleviated salinity damage in tomato.

Treatment
Application of MIe7
Interactor
microbial inoculante6symbiont
Outcome
salinity damagee7
Direction
alleviatede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“stress-responsive genes in tomato induced by soil salinity resulted from nitrate fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–145 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of MI alleviated the salinity damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2276–2324 · show in text ↑
e6

“a microbial inoculant (MI) was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low application rate of nitrate salts increased total biomass and fruit yield of tomato, unlike NaCl.

Treatment
nitrate salts at low application ratee0
Outcome
total biomass and fruit yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different from NaCl, nitrate salts at low application rate increased the total biomass and fruit yield of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2047 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low application rate of nitrate salts induced up-regulation of stress-responsive gene expression in tomato, unlike NaCl.

Treatment
nitrate salts at low application ratee0
Gene
stress-responsive genese1
Outcome
expression of stress-responsive genese1
Direction
up-regulatione1
Comparator
NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different from NaCl, nitrate salts at low application rate increased the total biomass and fruit yield of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2047 · show in text ↑
e1

“induced up-regulation expression of stress-responsive genes and the consequent active osmotic adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low application rate of nitrate salts induced active osmotic adjustment in tomato, unlike NaCl.

Treatment
nitrate salts at low application ratee0
Outcome
active osmotic adjustmente1
Direction
inducede1
Comparator
NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different from NaCl, nitrate salts at low application rate increased the total biomass and fruit yield of tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1935–2047 · show in text ↑
e1

“induced up-regulation expression of stress-responsive genes and the consequent active osmotic adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2052–2156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-level nitrate application negatively affected tomato plants irrespective of gene up-regulation.

Treatment
nitrate application at high levele2
Outcome
tomato plantse2
Direction
negatively affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“nitrate application at high level negatively affected tomato plants irrespective of the gene up-regulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2167–2274 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · organism · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · pest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 31 positive, 17 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.