Paper · 1987 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Physiology

T. Takano

12
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plant growth was inhibited owing to excess or luxury consumption of nitrogen with relatively lower protein accumulation by continuous nitrate supply. However, nitrogen was the dominant nutrient, if the amount of nitrate supply was adequate. The uptake of cations, especially potassium, was dependent on that of nitrate. There was a close correlation between anions and cations uptake. Although the optimum ratio of sulfate ions to total anions was approximately 15%, the application at higher sulfate levels was effective for the control of plant growth. It seems that a nutrimental period corresponds with the developmental stage of plants. The requirement of phosphate ions was nearly the same as that of sulfate ions. However, phosphate promoted the functional transition from sink to source leaf at successive leaf position, whereas sulfate retarded such the transition. Phosphate or sulfate supply at higher levels inhibited the dry matter production in plants. From these results, the optimum ratio of nitrate:phosphate: Sulfate in nutrient solution was estimated to be 70:15:15% of total anions in chemical equivalent for vegetative growth. Key words: Nitrogen statusdevelopmental stageoptimal ratio of anionsmethod of systematic variation

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous nitrate supply inhibited plant growth and yielded relatively lower protein accumulation.

Taxon
Plante0
Treatment
continuous nitrate supplye0
Outcome
Plant growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth was inhibited owing to excess or luxury consumption of nitrogen with relatively lower protein accumulation by continuous nitrate supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous nitrate supply produced relatively lower protein accumulation.

Taxon
Plante0
Treatment
continuous nitrate supplye0
Outcome
protein accumulatione0
Direction
relatively lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth was inhibited owing to excess or luxury consumption of nitrogen with relatively lower protein accumulation by continuous nitrate supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate nitrate supply made nitrogen the dominant nutrient.

Taxon
Plante1
Outcome
dominant nutriente0
Qualifier
if the amount of nitrate supply was adequatee0

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen was the dominant nutrient, if the amount of nitrate supply was adequate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–248 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cation uptake depended on nitrate uptake, especially potassium.

Taxon
Plante1
Compound
nitratee0
Outcome
uptake of cationse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake of cations, especially potassium, was dependent on that of nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anion and cation uptake correlated closely.

Taxon
Plante1
Compound
anionse0
Outcome
anions and cations uptakee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was a close correlation between anions and cations uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–392 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum sulfate-to-total-anion ratio was approximately 15%.

Taxon
Plante1
Outcome
optimum ratio of sulfate ions to total anionse0
Value
approximately 15%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum ratio of sulfate ions to total anions was approximately 15%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–474 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher sulfate application controlled plant growth.

Taxon
Plante1
Treatment
higher sulfate levelse0
Outcome
control of plant growthe0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application at higher sulfate levels was effective for the control of plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–562 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nutritional period appeared to correspond with developmental stage.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Organ / stage
developmental stagee0
Outcome
nutrimental periode0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“It seems that a nutrimental period corresponds with the developmental stage of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate requirement was nearly the same as sulfate requirement.

Taxon
Plante1
Outcome
requirement of phosphate ionse0
Direction
nearly the samee0
Comparator
sulfate ionse0

Verbatim

e0

“The requirement of phosphate ions was nearly the same as that of sulfate ions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate promoted leaf transition from sink to source.

Taxon
Plante1
Treatment
phosphatee0
Outcome
functional transition from sink to source leafe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“phosphate promoted the functional transition from sink to source leaf at successive leaf position”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High phosphate or sulfate inhibited plant dry-matter production.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
Phosphate or sulfate supply at higher levelse0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate or sulfate supply at higher levels inhibited the dry matter production in plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–974 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated optimal nitrate:phosphate:sulfate ratio was 70:15:15% of total anions.

Taxon
Plante1
Outcome
optimum ratio of nitrate:phosphate: Sulfatee0
Value
70:15:15% of total anionse0
Qualifier
for vegetative growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“the optimum ratio of nitrate:phosphate: Sulfate in nutrient solution was estimated to be 70:15:15% of total anions in chemical equivalent for vegetative growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth was inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–35 · show in text ↑

sulfate · yield · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Viridiplantae (plants)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.