Paper · 1968 · American Journal of Botany

Different Species, Sucrose, and Light in Plant Section Elongation Tests

Burlyn E. Michel

14
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sections from both dark- and light-grown seedlings of 11 species were used to test responses to IAA (indoleacetic acid), sucrose, and an inhibitor prepared from cabbage seedlings. Variability among species was great; however, results indicate that many species, light-grown as well as dark-grown, could prove useful in bioassays and probably should be investigated. Although elongation of segments from high-intensity-light-grown cabbage and cucumber hypocotyls and oat coleoptiles had essentially stopped by the time of cutting, their growth and response to IAA as sections were considerable. Neither oat coleoptile nor pea internode sections can be considered representative because of differences in responses to sucrose, of dark-grown sections to light, and to an inhibitor prepared from cabbage. Sucrose generally did not stimulate and even inhibited response of most hypocotyls to IAA. Sucrose was absorbed by sections, increasing final dry weight while not affecting elongation. Sucrose reduced the rate of respiratory decay in cabbage and sunflower, but IAA did not affect respiration. Changes in length and fresh weight of cucumber hypocotyl sections were comparable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant section responses varied greatly among species.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
Variability among speciese0

Verbatim

e0

“Variability among species was great”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–215 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many light-grown and dark-grown plant species could be useful in bioassays.

Taxon
speciese0
Outcome
useful in bioassayse0
Comparator
light-grown as well as dark-growne0

Verbatim

e0

“results indicate that many species, light-grown as well as dark-grown, could prove useful in bioassays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–328 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-intensity-light-grown cabbage hypocotyl sections showed considerable growth and IAA response after cutting despite prior elongation stopping.

Organ / stage
hypocotylse0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
growth and response to IAA as sectionse0
Qualifier
high-intensity-light-growne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although elongation of segments from high-intensity-light-grown cabbage and cucumber hypocotyls and oat coleoptiles had essentially stopped by the time of cutting, their growth and response to IAA as sections were considerable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–593 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-intensity-light-grown cucumber hypocotyl sections showed considerable growth and IAA response after cutting.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Organ / stage
hypocotylse0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
growth and response to IAA as sectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high-intensity-light-grown cabbage and cucumber hypocotyls and oat coleoptiles had essentially stopped by the time of cutting, their growth and response to IAA as sections were considerable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–592 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-intensity-light-grown oat coleoptile sections showed considerable growth and IAA response after cutting.

Organ / stage
coleoptilese0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
growth and response to IAA as sectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high-intensity-light-grown cabbage and cucumber hypocotyls and oat coleoptiles had essentially stopped by the time of cutting, their growth and response to IAA as sections were considerable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–592 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat coleoptile sections were not representative in their responses to sucrose, light and cabbage inhibitor.

Organ / stage
coleoptilee0
Outcome
considered representativee0
Comparator
pea internode sectionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither oat coleoptile nor pea internode sections can be considered representative because of differences in responses to sucrose, of dark-grown sections to light, and to an inhibitor prepared from cabbage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–800 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pea internode sections were not representative in their responses to sucrose, light and cabbage inhibitor.

Organ / stage
internode sectionse0
Outcome
considered representativee0
Comparator
oat coleoptilee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither oat coleoptile nor pea internode sections can be considered representative because of differences in responses to sucrose, of dark-grown sections to light, and to an inhibitor prepared from cabbage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose generally failed to stimulate and sometimes inhibited hypocotyl response to IAA.

Taxon
speciest0
Treatment
Sucrosee0
Outcome
response of most hypocotyls to IAAe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose generally did not stimulate and even inhibited response of most hypocotyls to IAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Species, Sucrose, and Light in Plant Section Elongation Tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose absorption increased final dry weight of plant sections.

Taxon
speciest0
Treatment
Sucrosee0
Outcome
final dry weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose was absorbed by sections, increasing final dry weight while not affecting elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Species, Sucrose, and Light in Plant Section Elongation Tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose absorption did not affect section elongation.

Taxon
speciest0
Treatment
Sucrosee0
Outcome
elongatione0
Direction
not affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose was absorbed by sections, increasing final dry weight while not affecting elongation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Species, Sucrose, and Light in Plant Section Elongation Tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose reduced the rate of respiratory decay in cabbage.

Treatment
Sucrosee0
Outcome
rate of respiratory decaye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose reduced the rate of respiratory decay in cabbage and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose reduced the rate of respiratory decay in sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Sucrosee0
Outcome
rate of respiratory decaye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose reduced the rate of respiratory decay in cabbage and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1056 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA did not affect respiration.

Taxon
speciest0
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
respiratione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“IAA did not affect respiration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Species, Sucrose, and Light in Plant Section Elongation Tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Length and fresh-weight changes in cucumber hypocotyl sections were comparable.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Organ / stage
hypocotyl sectionse0
Outcome
Changes in length and fresh weighte0
Direction
comparablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Changes in length and fresh weight of cucumber hypocotyl sections were comparable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1176 · show in text ↑

sucrose · disease · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · disease · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.