Paper · 2015 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Nematicidal Potentialities of Alginate Controlled-Release Formulations of Aldicarb and Cadusafos on The Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato

Soltan, Hamdy R.; Marei, A. S.; Mousa, A.

16
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Two separate pot experiments was conducted to evaluate the nematicidal activity of the alginate controlled release (CR) formulations of aldicarb (FA3, FA6 and FA9) and cadusafos (FC3, FC6 and FC9) versus the corresponding granule formulations against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato under green house conditions. The results indicated that all the tested formulations significantly reduced the number of galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in the soil as compared with the untreated pots (control). On the other hand, the CR formulations of aldicarb and cadusafos could be reduced the galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in soil significantly compared with their granular formulations. The percentage reduction in nematode galls for all the CR formulations of aldicarb and cadusafos were ranged from (95.1% to 96.04%) and (87.1% to 88.03%) for aldicarb and cadusafos, respectively. Whereas, the lowest percentage of reduction of the number of tomato galls was recorded with aldicarb and cadusafos granule formulation (61.3% and 66.71%), respectively. Also, the maximum reduction of the number of 2nd juveniles in the soil was achieved by the FA3 (86.73%) and FC3 (89.08%), while for its corresponding granule was (59.05% and 46.23%). It could be noted that the nematicidal efficacy of the CR formulations against M. incognita reached to approximately 1.77 folds by FA3 and 1.93 folds by FC3 comparable to the commercial formulations. The possible effects of different aldicarb formulations residues on the chemical constituents of tomato fruits were determined and recorded at the end of the experiment (72 days). The results obtained indicating that all the aldicarb and cadusafos formulations had significantly decreased of the b-carotene, lycopene, and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruits comparable to the untreated pots. No significant differences were found between all the aldicarb formulations and the control on the percentage of the total soluble solid (T.S.S.) whereas there were significantly increased in the percentage of T.S.S. of tomato plant treated with the CR cadusafos formulations. The FA3 and FC3 could be applied on tomato plant to control nematode with a minimum side effect on the quality control parameters such as lycopene, T.S.S. and ascorbic acid content of tomato juice compared with the commercial formulations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested formulations reduced galls, egg masses and soil second juveniles versus untreated pots.

Treatment
all the tested formulationse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
number of galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in the soile0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
untreated pots (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the tested formulations significantly reduced the number of galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in the soil as compared with the untreated pots (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release aldicarb reduced nematode measures more than granular aldicarb.

Treatment
CR formulations of aldicarbe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in soile0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
their granular formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CR formulations of aldicarb and cadusafos could be reduced the galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in soil significantly compared with their granular formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release cadusafos reduced nematode measures more than its granules.

Treatment
cadusafose0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in soile0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
their granular formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CR formulations of aldicarb and cadusafos could be reduced the galls, egg masses, and 2nd juveniles in soil significantly compared with their granular formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 549–716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release aldicarb reduced nematode galls by 95.1% to 96.04%.

Treatment
CR formulations of aldicarbe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode gallse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
95.1% to 96.04%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage reduction in nematode galls for all the CR formulations of aldicarb and cadusafos were ranged from (95.1% to 96.04%) and (87.1% to 88.03%) for aldicarb and cadusafos, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release cadusafos reduced nematode galls by 87.1% to 88.03%.

Treatment
cadusafose0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
nematode gallse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
87.1% to 88.03%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage reduction in nematode galls for all the CR formulations of aldicarb and cadusafos were ranged from (95.1% to 96.04%) and (87.1% to 88.03%) for aldicarb and cadusafos, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular aldicarb reduced tomato galls by 61.3%.

Treatment
aldicarbe0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
number of tomato gallse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
61.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest percentage of reduction of the number of tomato galls was recorded with aldicarb and cadusafos granule formulation (61.3% and 66.71%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Granular cadusafos reduced tomato galls by 66.71%.

Treatment
cadusafose0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
number of tomato gallse0
Direction
reductione0
Value
66.71%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lowest percentage of reduction of the number of tomato galls was recorded with aldicarb and cadusafos granule formulation (61.3% and 66.71%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FA3 maximally reduced soil second juveniles by 86.73%, compared with 59.05% for its granule.

Treatment
FA3e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
number of 2nd juveniles in the soile0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Value
86.73%e0
Qualifier
59.05%e0
Comparator
its corresponding granulee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction of the number of 2nd juveniles in the soil was achieved by the FA3 (86.73%) and FC3 (89.08%), while for its corresponding granule was (59.05% and 46.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FC3 maximally reduced soil second juveniles by 89.08%, compared with 46.23% for its granule.

Treatment
FC3e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pathogen
Outcome
number of 2nd juveniles in the soile0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Value
89.08%e0
Qualifier
46.23%e0
Comparator
its corresponding granulee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum reduction of the number of 2nd juveniles in the soil was achieved by the FA3 (86.73%) and FC3 (89.08%), while for its corresponding granule was (59.05% and 46.23%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FA3 nematicidal efficacy was approximately 1.77 folds that of commercial formulations.

Treatment
FA3e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
nematicidal efficacye0
Direction
reachede0
Value
1.77 foldse0
Comparator
commercial formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematicidal efficacy of the CR formulations against M. incognita reached to approximately 1.77 folds by FA3 and 1.93 folds by FC3 comparable to the commercial formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FC3 nematicidal efficacy was approximately 1.93 folds that of commercial formulations.

Treatment
FC3e0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
nematicidal efficacye0
Direction
reachede0
Value
1.93 foldse0
Comparator
commercial formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nematicidal efficacy of the CR formulations against M. incognita reached to approximately 1.77 folds by FA3 and 1.93 folds by FC3 comparable to the commercial formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Meloidogyne incognita Infecting Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb formulations decreased tomato fruit b-carotene, lycopene and ascorbic acid versus untreated pots.

Treatment
aldicarbe0
Outcome
b-carotene, lycopene, and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruitse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the aldicarb and cadusafos formulations had significantly decreased of the b-carotene, lycopene, and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruits comparable to the untreated pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadusafos formulations decreased tomato fruit b-carotene, lycopene and ascorbic acid versus untreated pots.

Treatment
cadusafose0
Outcome
b-carotene, lycopene, and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruitse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreated potse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the aldicarb and cadusafos formulations had significantly decreased of the b-carotene, lycopene, and ascorbic acid content of tomato fruits comparable to the untreated pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1859 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldicarb formulations did not significantly alter total soluble solids versus control.

Treatment
aldicarb formulationse0
Outcome
percentage of the total soluble solid (T.S.S.)e0
Direction
No significant differencese0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant differences were found between all the aldicarb formulations and the control on the percentage of the total soluble solid (T.S.S.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1861–2006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 155–161 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Controlled-release cadusafos significantly increased tomato total soluble solids.

Treatment
CR cadusafos formulationse0
Outcome
percentage of T.S.S.e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were significantly increased in the percentage of T.S.S. of tomato plant treated with the CR cadusafos formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2015–2136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

FA3 and FC3 could control tomato nematodes with minimal side effects on juice quality versus commercial formulations.

Treatment
FA3 and FC3e0
Outcome
control nematode with a minimum side effecte0
Comparator
commercial formulationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The FA3 and FC3 could be applied on tomato plant to control nematode with a minimum side effect on the quality control parameters such as lycopene, T.S.S. and ascorbic acid content of tomato juice compared with the commercial formulations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2138–2376 · show in text ↑

cadusafos · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

aldicarb · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 29 positive, 4 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.