Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during rabi seasons of 2015–16 and 2016–17 to find out the effect of P, S and biofertilizers on yield, nutrient uptake and economy in fertilizer use in lentil cv. Pant Lentil-5. N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively. The corresponding total N, P, K and S uptake values in grain+straw were 51.76, 5. 63, 11.06 and 3.35 kg/ha. Higher levels of phosphorus (P60), sulphur (S30) and dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB) encouraged the uptake of these nutrients in grain and straw significantly over their preceding levels. The combined application of P60S30+Rhizobium+PSB further augmented these nutrients in grain and straw. Dual seed inoculation with biofertilizer proved most economical, and, therefore, use of costly chemical fertilizers may be curtailed to some extent.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil grain N content was 3.57%.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Organ / stage
- graine0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 3.57e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil grain P content was 0.447%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 0.447e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil grain K content was 0.67%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 0.67e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil grain S content was 0.205%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- graine0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 0.205%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil straw N content was 2.19%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- strawe0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 2.19e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil straw P content was 0.214%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- strawe0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 0.214e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil straw K content was 0.52%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- strawe0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 0.52e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil straw S content was 0.156%.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- strawe0
- Outcome
- contentse0
- Value
- 0.156%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“N, P, K and S contents in lentil grain were 3.57, 0.447, 0.67 and 0.205%, whereas in straw 2.19, 0.214, 0.52 and 0.156%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Total lentil N uptake in grain and straw was 51.76 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- grain+strawe0
- Outcome
- uptake valuese0
- Value
- 51.76e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“The corresponding total N, P, K and S uptake values in grain+straw were 51.76, 5. 63, 11.06 and 3.35 kg/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Total lentil P uptake in grain and straw was 5. 63 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- grain+strawe0
- Outcome
- uptake valuese0
- Value
- 5. 63e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“The corresponding total N, P, K and S uptake values in grain+straw were 51.76, 5. 63, 11.06 and 3.35 kg/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Total lentil K uptake in grain and straw was 11.06 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- grain+strawe0
- Outcome
- uptake valuese0
- Value
- 11.06e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“The corresponding total N, P, K and S uptake values in grain+straw were 51.76, 5. 63, 11.06 and 3.35 kg/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Total lentil S uptake in grain and straw was 3.35 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Organ / stage
- grain+strawe0
- Outcome
- uptake valuese0
- Value
- 3.35 kg/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“The corresponding total N, P, K and S uptake values in grain+straw were 51.76, 5. 63, 11.06 and 3.35 kg/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
phosphorus (P60) significantly increased nutrient uptake in lentil grain and straw relative to preceding levels.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- phosphorus (P60)e0
- Outcome
- uptake of these nutrients in grain and strawe0
- Direction
- encouragede0
- Comparator
- their preceding levelse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“Higher levels of phosphorus (P60), sulphur (S30) and dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB) encouraged the uptake of these nutrients in grain and straw significantly over their preceding levels.”
Claim · model-written summary
sulphur (S30) significantly increased nutrient uptake in lentil grain and straw relative to preceding levels.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- sulphur (S30)e0
- Outcome
- uptake of these nutrients in grain and strawe0
- Direction
- encouragede0
- Comparator
- their preceding levelse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“Higher levels of phosphorus (P60), sulphur (S30) and dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB) encouraged the uptake of these nutrients in grain and straw significantly over their preceding levels.”
Claim · model-written summary
dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB) significantly increased nutrient uptake in lentil grain and straw relative to preceding levels.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB)e0
- Outcome
- uptake of these nutrients in grain and strawe0
- Direction
- encouragede0
- Comparator
- their preceding levelse0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“Higher levels of phosphorus (P60), sulphur (S30) and dual biofertilizers (Rhizobium+PSB) encouraged the uptake of these nutrients in grain and straw significantly over their preceding levels.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined P60S30+Rhizobium+PSB further increased lentil grain and straw nutrients.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- P60S30+Rhizobium+PSBe0
- Outcome
- these nutrients in grain and strawe0
- Direction
- augmentede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“The combined application of P60S30+Rhizobium+PSB further augmented these nutrients in grain and straw.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dual seed inoculation with biofertilizer was the most economical lentil treatment.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- Dual seed inoculation with biofertilizere0
- Outcome
- most economicale0
- Direction
- most economicale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“Dual seed inoculation with biofertilizer proved most economical”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest curtailing costly chemical fertilizer use to some extent with dual biofertilizer inoculation.
- Taxon
- lentilLens culinarist0
- Outcome
- use of costly chemical fertilizers may be curtailed to some extente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
e0“therefore, use of costly chemical fertilizers may be curtailed to some extent.”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.