Paper · 2015 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Factors Influencing Rootability of Dracaena Cuttings

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings (tip, middle and basal) were treated with certain growth regulators (IAA,IBA and NAA), each applied individually at 1000 ppm as a powder, beside control treatment to define the most effective combination of auxin and cutting types stimulating the rootability. The highest percentage of rooted cuttings was resulted from IBA (73%) followed by IAA (46%) and NAA (32%). Tip-shoot cuttings showed the maximum rooting percentage (46%), while basal cuttings resulted in the minimum rooting percentage, however, middle cuttings appeared intermediate responses. Also, IBA produced higher number and shorter roots than IAA. Similarly, basal cuttings produced the highest root number and formed the shortest roots. Generally, tip-shoot cuttings treated with IBA 1000 ppm proved to be more effective treatment enhancing the rooting percentage (88%) and improving root characteristics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA produced the highest rooted-cutting percentage, 73%.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Treatment
IBAe0
Outcome
percentage of rooted cuttingse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
73%e0
Comparator
IAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of rooted cuttings was resulted from IBA (73%) followed by IAA (46%) and NAA (32%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IAA yielded 46% rooted cuttings, below IBA.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Treatment
IAAe0
Outcome
percentage of rooted cuttingse0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
46%e0
Comparator
IBAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of rooted cuttings was resulted from IBA (73%) followed by IAA (46%) and NAA (32%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA yielded 32% rooted cuttings, below IAA.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Treatment
NAAe0
Outcome
percentage of rooted cuttingse0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
IAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest percentage of rooted cuttings was resulted from IBA (73%) followed by IAA (46%) and NAA (32%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 294–399 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tip-shoot cuttings had maximum rooting of 46%.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Material
Tip-shoot cuttingse0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
46%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tip-shoot cuttings showed the maximum rooting percentage (46%), while basal cuttings resulted in the minimum rooting percentage, however, middle cuttings appeared intermediate responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal cuttings had minimum rooting, while middle cuttings were intermediate.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Material
basal cuttingse0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal cuttings resulted in the minimum rooting percentage, however, middle cuttings appeared intermediate responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Middle cuttings had intermediate rooting.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Material
middle cuttingse0
Outcome
intermediate responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“middle cuttings appeared intermediate responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–586 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA produced more but shorter roots than IAA.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Treatment
IBAe0
Outcome
number and shorter rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
IAAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“IBA produced higher number and shorter roots than IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–647 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal cuttings produced the highest root number.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Material
basal cuttingse0
Outcome
root numbere0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal cuttings produced the highest root number and formed the shortest roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal cuttings formed the shortest roots.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Material
basal cuttingse0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
shorteste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal cuttings produced the highest root number and formed the shortest roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–737 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tip-shoot cuttings treated with IBA 1000 ppm achieved 88% rooting and improved root characteristics.

Taxon
Dracaena marginataDracaena marginatae1
Material
tip-shoot cuttingse0
Treatment
IBA 1000 ppme0
Outcome
rooting percentagee0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dracaena marginata
Dracaena marginata · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tip-shoot cuttings treated with IBA 1000 ppm proved to be more effective treatment enhancing the rooting percentage (88%) and improving root characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dracaena marginata, Lam. Cuttings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33 · show in text ↑

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Dracaena marginataResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.