Paper · 2008 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Influence of Irrigation with Saline Water on Yield and Nutrients Uptake of Wheat Plant Grown in Sandy and Sandy Loam Soils

Kh. Ahmed, Hussein; A. Fawy, Hassan; EL-Nagar, G.Y.

10
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

This study was carried out using two soil types of West Delta region, Egypt, at El-Bostan (sandy soil) and North El-Tahrir (sandy loam soil). A two-pot experiment at greenhouse had done through two years 2006 and 2007. The saline irrigation water consists of NaCl, CaCl2 and their mixture (1:1), and added them by 4 doses, (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 M/L). The aim of this study attained the effect of irrigation with saline water on nutrients uptake and production of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Sakha8.The obtained results indicated when increase levels of salts in irrigation water, soil pH and EC had positively increased, while the nutrients available in soils or uptake were decrease. Therefore, the plant growth and production of wheat had decreased. The NaCl salt had the highest negative effect on nutrients uptake and production of wheat, and CaCl2 salt had the lowest, while the mixture salts had moderate effect. The suitable level range of NaCl salt was 0.1-0.2M/L and 0.1-0.3M/L for CaCl2 salt, which achieved economic yield of wheat. The critical level of salinity was 0.3M/L of NaCl salt and 0.4M/L of CaCl2 salt, which caused high decrease in yield and damage in soil properties. The grain yields of wheat at rate 0.4M/L of NaCl and CaCl2 was 0.33 and 0.51 Ton/Fed respectively, while it was 1.36 Ton/Fed at the control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salt raised soil pH and EC.

Treatment
increase levels of salts in irrigation watere0
Outcome
soil pH and ECe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when increase levels of salts in irrigation water, soil pH and EC had positively increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–624 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth and production of wheat had decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salt reduced available soil nutrients and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
increase levels of salts in irrigation watere0
Outcome
nutrients available in soils or uptakee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when increase levels of salts in irrigation water, soil pH and EC had positively increased, while the nutrients available in soils or uptake were decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–689 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth and production of wheat had decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–755 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced wheat growth and production.

Treatment
increase levels of salts in irrigation watere1
Outcome
plant growth and production of wheate0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, the plant growth and production of wheat had decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–756 · show in text ↑
e1

“when increase levels of salts in irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–583 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl had the strongest negative effect on wheat nutrient uptake and production, CaCl2 the weakest, and the mixture an intermediate effect.

Outcome
nutrients uptake and production of wheate0
Direction
highest negative effecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The NaCl salt had the highest negative effect on nutrients uptake and production of wheat, and CaCl2 salt had the lowest, while the mixture salts had moderate effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–923 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NaCl at 0.1-0.2M/L was identified as a suitable range for economic wheat yield.

Treatment
NaCl salt was 0.1-0.2M/Le0
Outcome
economic yield of wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The suitable level range of NaCl salt was 0.1-0.2M/L and 0.1-0.3M/L for CaCl2 salt, which achieved economic yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1047 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

CaCl2 at 0.1-0.3M/L was identified as a suitable range for economic wheat yield.

Treatment
0.1-0.3M/L for CaCl2 salte0
Outcome
economic yield of wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The suitable level range of NaCl salt was 0.1-0.2M/L and 0.1-0.3M/L for CaCl2 salt, which achieved economic yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1047 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical NaCl salinity was 0.3M/L, causing yield decline and soil damage.

Outcome
high decrease in yield and damage in soil propertiese0
Value
0.3M/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical level of salinity was 0.3M/L of NaCl salt and 0.4M/L of CaCl2 salt, which caused high decrease in yield and damage in soil properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical CaCl2 salinity was 0.4M/L, causing yield decline and soil damage.

Outcome
high decrease in yield and damage in soil propertiese0
Value
0.4M/Le0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The critical level of salinity was 0.3M/L of NaCl salt and 0.4M/L of CaCl2 salt, which caused high decrease in yield and damage in soil properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1195 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.4M/L NaCl, wheat grain yield was 0.33 Ton/Fed.

Treatment
0.4M/L of NaCle0
Outcome
grain yields of wheate0
Value
0.33e0
Qualifier
1.36 Ton/Fede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yields of wheat at rate 0.4M/L of NaCl and CaCl2 was 0.33 and 0.51 Ton/Fed respectively, while it was 1.36 Ton/Fed at the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1346 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.4M/L CaCl2, wheat grain yield was 0.51 Ton/Fed.

Treatment
0.4M/L of NaCl and CaCl2e0
Outcome
grain yields of wheate0
Value
0.51 Ton/Fede0
Qualifier
1.36 Ton/Fede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yields of wheat at rate 0.4M/L of NaCl and CaCl2 was 0.33 and 0.51 Ton/Fed respectively, while it was 1.36 Ton/Fed at the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1346 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

28 papers: 9 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

salinity · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 19 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 74 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.