Paper · 2017 · Agriciltural microbiology

PRODUCTIVITY OF POTATOES MICROPLANTS IN VIVO GROWN UNDER THE ACTION OF DIFFERENT LIGHTNING SPECTRA

L. M. Reshotko; S. V. Derevianko; O. O. Dmytruk

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

It has been established that the use of additional lightning by phyto LEDs undercultivation of potatoes microplants provides a positive effect on the survival and productivity ofpotatoes microplants in open ground conditions. Depending on the type of potato and thedifferent lighting spectrum, the survival rate of potatoes microplants was 66–86 % with thesurvival rates in the control 53 – 77 %; an increase in the multiplication factor of plants by 0.5 –0.8 units, depending on the type of potato and the different lighting spectrum, an increase in theaverage weight of the clone by 5.02 – 19.95 %, depending on the variety.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional phyto LED lighting raised potato microplant survival to 66–86 % versus 53 – 77 % in controls.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
Treatment
different lighting spectrume0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
66–86 %e0
Qualifier
53 – 77 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Depending on the type of potato and thedifferent lighting spectrum, the survival rate of potatoes microplants was 66–86 % with thesurvival rates in the control 53 – 77 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lighting increased potato microplant multiplication factor by 0.5 –0.8 units.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
different lighting spectrume0
Outcome
multiplication factor of plantse0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.5 –0.8 unitse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the multiplication factor of plants by 0.5 –0.8 units, depending on the type of potato and the different lighting spectrum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 397–534 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES MICROPLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lighting increased average clone weight by 5.02 – 19.95 %, depending on variety.

Taxon
POTATOESSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
LIGHTNING SPECTRAt0
Outcome
average weight of the clonee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.02 – 19.95 %e0
Qualifier
depending on the varietye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in theaverage weight of the clone by 5.02 – 19.95 %, depending on the variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–625 · show in text ↑
t0

“POTATOES MICROPLANTS IN VIVO GROWN UNDER THE ACTION OF DIFFERENT LIGHTNING SPECTRA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–98 · show in text ↑

light · pest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

light · survival · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.