Paper · 2014 · Open Journal of Ecology

From Monoculture to Norfolk System: How the Number of Crops in Rotation Can Influence the Biodiversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Assemblages in the Soil

Franco Magurno; Zita Sasvári; Lorenzo Barchi; et al.

2
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Given the attention drawn since several decades by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) as potential biological alternatives to chemicals in a low-input agriculture, much effort has been spent in the investigation of mechanisms influencing the dynamics inside AMF communities. In the present study we evaluated the influence of different crop rotations on the AMF soil community, after a 50 y long-term field experiment established at Martonvásár, Hungary. Four types of crop rotation were chosen for sampling: corn monocropping, corn-alfalfa, corn-wheat, and corn-spring barley-peas-wheat. Community composition of AMF in soil was analyzed with a molecular approach amplifying a portion of 28S rDNA. The crop rotation practice didn’t show an influence on identity of the species composing AMF assemblages, but on the other hand seemed to affect positively the true diversity, defined as number of MOTUs present in the communities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation practice did not change the identity of the species composing AMF assemblages in corn.

Treatment
crop rotation practicee2
Interactor
AMFe2symbiont
Outcome
identity of the species composing AMF assemblagese2
Direction
didn’t show an influencee2
Comparator
corn monocroppinge1
Setting
Martonvásár, Hungarye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Four types of crop rotation were chosen for sampling: corn monocropping, corn-alfalfa, corn-wheat, and corn-spring barley-peas-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–587 · show in text ↑
e2

“The crop rotation practice didn’t show an influence on identity of the species composing AMF assemblages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–803 · show in text ↑
e4

“after a 50 y long-term field experiment established at Martonvásár, Hungary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation seemed to increase the true diversity of AMF communities in corn, counted as number of MOTUs.

Treatment
crop rotatione1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
true diversity, defined as number of MOTUs present in the communitiese3
Direction
affect positivelye3
Qualifier
seemede3
Comparator
corn monocroppinge1
Setting
Martonvásár, Hungarye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) as potential biological alternatives to chemicals in a low-input agriculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–162 · show in text ↑
e1

“Four types of crop rotation were chosen for sampling: corn monocropping, corn-alfalfa, corn-wheat, and corn-spring barley-peas-wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–587 · show in text ↑
e3

“seemed to affect positively the true diversity, defined as number of MOTUs present in the communities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–928 · show in text ↑
e4

“after a 50 y long-term field experiment established at Martonvásár, Hungary”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–453 · show in text ↑

rotation · ecology: diversity · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.