Paper · 1996 · Experimental Agriculture

Responses of Young Tea (Camellia sinensis) Clones to Drought and Temperature. II. Dry Matter Production and Partitioning

P. J. Burgess; M. K. V. Carr

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY The physiological basis for differences in yields from well-watered and draughted plants of four contrasting clones of tea was studied in terms of light interception, dry matter production and partitioning at a high altitude site in Southern Tanzania where there are marked seasonal variations in rainfall and temperature. The plant dry weights, including roots, were measured eight months after field planting and subsequently at intervals of three to four months, corresponding to the different seasons, during the following two years. Fully irrigated plants of one clone (S15/10) were also harvested after four years in the field. Clones differed in the rates of canopy spread and hence in their capacity to intercept solar radiation. The ‘radiation use efficiency’ (the net total dry matter production per unit of intercepted short-wave radiation) was similar for the four well-watered clones and ranged from 0.40 to 0.66 g MJ −1 , which corresponds closely to values reported for other woody tropical plants. A 16-week drought treatment imposed two years after planting reduced the mean light interception of the four clones by about 25% and the mean radiation use efficiency by 78% to 0.09 g MJ −1 . Clone S15/10, a cultivar from Kenya which produces large yields, partitioned a greater proportion of dry matter to leaves and harvested shoots than the other clones, and correspondingly less to large structural roots. This resulted in a maximum harvest index of 24%, substantially greater than other values reported in the literature. There were seasonal differences in partitioning, with more dry matter being diverted to roots and less to shoots during the cool season. Although the drought treatments had no significant effect on root growth, the amount of dry matter partitioned to leaves, stems and harvested shoots declined by 80–95%. The roots of all four clones extended in depth at similar rates (about 2 mm d −1 ), those of Clone S15/10 reaching 2.8m after four years. The results are discussed in terms of appropriate field cultural practices and possible selection criteria for high yielding clones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency of four well-watered tea clones was similar, at 0.40 to 0.66 g MJ.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Outcome
radiation use efficiencye3
Value
0.40 to 0.66 g MJe1
Qualifier
well-watered clonese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“(the net total dry matter production per unit of intercepted short-wave radiation) was similar for the four well-watered clones and ranged from 0.40 to 0.66 g MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–938 · show in text ↑
e3

“and the mean radiation use efficiency by 78% to 0.09 g MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 16-week drought reduced mean light interception of tea clones by about 25% relative to well-watered plants.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
16-week drought treatmente2
Outcome
light interceptione2
Direction
reducede2
Value
25%e2
Comparator
well-waterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“The physiological basis for differences in yields from well-watered and draughted plants of four contrasting clones of tea was studied in terms of light interception, dry matter production and partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“A 16-week drought treatment imposed two years after planting reduced the mean light interception of the four clones by about 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 16-week drought reduced radiation use efficiency of tea clones by 78% to 0.09 g MJ relative to well-watered plants.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
16-week drought treatmente2
Outcome
radiation use efficiencye3
Direction
reducede2
Value
78%e3
Qualifier
0.09 g MJe3
Comparator
well-waterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“The physiological basis for differences in yields from well-watered and draughted plants of four contrasting clones of tea was studied in terms of light interception, dry matter production and partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“A 16-week drought treatment imposed two years after planting reduced the mean light interception of the four clones by about 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1150 · show in text ↑
e3

“and the mean radiation use efficiency by 78% to 0.09 g MJ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone S15/10 partitioned a greater proportion of dry matter to leaves and harvested shoots than the other clones.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Material
Clone S15/10e4
Outcome
dry matter to leaves and harvested shootse4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
other clonese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e4

“Clone S15/10, a cultivar from Kenya which produces large yields, partitioned a greater proportion of dry matter to leaves and harvested shoots than the other clones, and correspondingly less to large structural roots. This resulted in a maximum harvest index of 24%, substantially greater than other values reported in the literature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1547 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone S15/10 had a maximum harvest index of 24%.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Material
Clone S15/10e4
Outcome
harvest indexe4
Direction
maximume4
Value
24%e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e4

“Clone S15/10, a cultivar from Kenya which produces large yields, partitioned a greater proportion of dry matter to leaves and harvested shoots than the other clones, and correspondingly less to large structural roots. This resulted in a maximum harvest index of 24%, substantially greater than other values reported in the literature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1547 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the cool season, tea plants diverted more dry matter to roots and less to shoots.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Outcome
partitioninge5
Direction
moree5
Setting
cool seasone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e5

“There were seasonal differences in partitioning, with more dry matter being diverted to roots and less to shoots during the cool season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought treatments had no significant effect on root growth of tea.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
drought treatmentse6
Outcome
root growthe6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6
Comparator
well-waterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“The physiological basis for differences in yields from well-watered and draughted plants of four contrasting clones of tea was studied in terms of light interception, dry matter production and partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–213 · show in text ↑
e6

“Although the drought treatments had no significant effect on root growth, the amount of dry matter partitioned to leaves, stems and harvested shoots declined by 80–95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought treatments reduced dry matter partitioned to leaves, stems and harvested shoots by 80–95% relative to well-watered plants.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Treatment
drought treatmentse6
Outcome
dry matter partitioned to leaves, stems and harvested shootse6
Direction
declinede6
Value
80–95%e6
Comparator
well-waterede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e0

“The physiological basis for differences in yields from well-watered and draughted plants of four contrasting clones of tea was studied in terms of light interception, dry matter production and partitioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–213 · show in text ↑
e6

“Although the drought treatments had no significant effect on root growth, the amount of dry matter partitioned to leaves, stems and harvested shoots declined by 80–95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1686–1853 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tea roots extended in depth at about 2 mm per day.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Organ / stage
rootse7
Outcome
extended in depthe7
Value
2 mm de7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e7

“The roots of all four clones extended in depth at similar rates (about 2 mm d −1 ), those of Clone S15/10 reaching 2.8m after four years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1991 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Roots of Clone S15/10 reached 2.8 m depth after four years.

Taxon
Camellia sinensisCamellia sinensist0
Material
Clone S15/10e7
Outcome
extended in depthe7
Value
2.8me7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia sinensis
Camellia sinensis · TaxonAxelBoldt at en.wikipedia · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Camellia sinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–41 · show in text ↑
e7

“The roots of all four clones extended in depth at similar rates (about 2 mm d −1 ), those of Clone S15/10 reaching 2.8m after four years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1855–1991 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Camellia sinensis (black tea)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.