Paper · 2015 · 2015 ASABE / IA Irrigation Symposium: Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Irrigation - A Tribute to the Career of Terry Howell, Sr. Conference Proceedings

Effects of sewage application on salt accumulation in soil and on sap flow of tomato plants under drip irrigation

Yanfeng Li; Jiusheng Li; Jiangli Wen

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sewage application is a cost-effective method for meeting the challenge of irrigation for water short regions. However, concern exists about the accumulation of salt from sewage effluent. Experiments were conducted for three years in a greenhouse to investigate the effects of water quality on salt accumulation in soil and on sap flow for drip irrigated tomato. The types of irrigation water used in the experiments included secondary sewage effluent, groundwater, and blend water that was obtained by mixing the secondary sewage effluent and the groundwater in equal volumes. The results demonstrated that drip irrigation using sewage effluent would increase the variance of soil salinity in the top soil layer. Irrigation throughout the growing season could produce a 44% increase of salt content from its initial values to values at harvest, and salt accumulation occurred mainly in the 30-45 cm depth of soil. Sewage application caused decreases of over 70% of observed sap flow values during the growing season. Especially during the late growing stage, the daily average sap flow for the sewage application was 24% less than that for the groundwater application treatment. Sewage application increased tomato yield and fruit quality parameters excluding ascorbic acid in both years. These results suggest that secondary sewage application using drip irrigation increase salt accumulation in the root zone, and depress crop transpiration to some extent, but not impose a negative influence on tomato yield and fruit quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage effluent drip irrigation increased variance in topsoil salinity.

Treatment
drip irrigation using sewage effluente0
Outcome
variance of soil salinity in the top soil layere0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip irrigation using sewage effluent would increase the variance of soil salinity in the top soil layer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation across the growing season increased soil salt content 44% from initial to harvest values.

Treatment
Irrigation throughout the growing seasone0
Outcome
salt contente0
Direction
increasee0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation throughout the growing season could produce a 44% increase of salt content from its initial values to values at harvest, and salt accumulation occurred mainly in the 30-45 cm depth of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt accumulated mainly at 30-45 cm soil depth.

Outcome
salt accumulatione0
Value
30-45 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“salt accumulation occurred mainly in the 30-45 cm depth of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage application decreased observed sap flow by over 70% during the growing season.

Treatment
Sewage applicatione0
Outcome
observed sap flow valuese0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
over 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sewage application caused decreases of over 70% of observed sap flow values during the growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During late growth, daily average sap flow with sewage application was 24% less than with groundwater.

Organ / stage
late growing stagee0
Treatment
sewage applicatione0
Outcome
daily average sap flowe0
Direction
lesse0
Value
24%e0
Comparator
groundwater application treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Especially during the late growing stage, the daily average sap flow for the sewage application was 24% less than that for the groundwater application treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1179 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage application increased tomato yield.

Treatment
Sewage applicatione0
Outcome
tomato yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sewage application increased tomato yield and fruit quality parameters excluding ascorbic acid in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1289 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage application increased fruit quality parameters other than ascorbic acid.

Treatment
Sewage applicatione0
Outcome
fruit quality parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
excluding ascorbic acid in both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sewage application increased tomato yield and fruit quality parameters excluding ascorbic acid in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1289 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude sewage drip irrigation increases root-zone salt accumulation.

Outcome
salt accumulation in the root zonee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that secondary sewage application using drip irrigation increase salt accumulation in the root zone, and depress crop transpiration to some extent, but not impose a negative influence on tomato yield and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude sewage drip irrigation depresses crop transpiration to some extent.

Outcome
crop transpiratione0
Direction
depresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that secondary sewage application using drip irrigation increase salt accumulation in the root zone, and depress crop transpiration to some extent, but not impose a negative influence on tomato yield and fruit quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–84 · show in text ↑

climate site · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 33 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.