Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Health Sciences

Impacts of liquid organic fertilizer on characterization of sunflower under irrigation water levels

Saied El Sayed; Farid Hellal; Amany Abd El-Mohsen Ramadan; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Liquid organic fertilizer (LOF) research has revealed its obvious benefits to plant productivity and soil fertility. These benefits are noticeable in the form of increased soil water holding capacity and plant nutrient availability. These alterations may also boost a plant's ability to withstand drought stress. The results indicated that foliar application of LOF at 1.50 L/fed was higher effective regarding the studied parameters under application of 100% water requirement (WR).The recorded sunflower yield parameters were significantly increased by application of LOF compared with the control. The foliar application of LOF increased water use efficiency for sunflower at the applied irrigation treatments. Under water stress, the application of LOF at 1.50 L/fed produced better agronomic performance of yield components, carbohydrates, protein, oil, flavonoids and antioxidant activity (DPPH radical scavenging) of sunflower seeds over remaining treatments. This dosage could be used for optimum sunflower production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of LOF at 1.50 L/fed was more effective for the studied parameters at 100% water requirement.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
foliar application of LOF at 1.50 L/fede0
Outcome
studied parameterse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under application of 100% water requirement (WR)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“characterization of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–69 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application of LOF at 1.50 L/fed was higher effective regarding the studied parameters under application of 100% water requirement (WR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower yield parameters were significantly increased by LOF application compared with the control.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
application of LOFe1
Outcome
sunflower yield parameterse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
the controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The recorded sunflower yield parameters were significantly increased by application of LOF compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 483–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar LOF application increased water use efficiency of sunflower at the applied irrigation treatments.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse2
Treatment
foliar application of LOFe2
Outcome
water use efficiencye2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
at the applied irrigation treatmentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The foliar application of LOF increased water use efficiency for sunflower at the applied irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–712 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, LOF at 1.50 L/fed gave better agronomic performance of yield components than the remaining treatments.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse5
Treatment
the application of LOF at 1.50 L/fede6
Outcome
yield componentse5
Direction
bettere5
Qualifier
Under water stresse6
Comparator
remaining treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“produced better agronomic performance of yield components, carbohydrates, protein, oil, flavonoids and antioxidant activity (DPPH radical scavenging) of sunflower seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–939 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under water stress, the application of LOF at 1.50 L/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–770 · show in text ↑
e4

“over remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, LOF at 1.50 L/fed gave better carbohydrates, protein and oil contents of sunflower seeds than the remaining treatments.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse5
Organ / stage
seedse5
Treatment
the application of LOF at 1.50 L/fede6
Outcome
carbohydrates, protein, oile5
Direction
bettere5
Comparator
remaining treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“produced better agronomic performance of yield components, carbohydrates, protein, oil, flavonoids and antioxidant activity (DPPH radical scavenging) of sunflower seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–939 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under water stress, the application of LOF at 1.50 L/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–770 · show in text ↑
e4

“over remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, LOF at 1.50 L/fed gave better flavonoid and antioxidant activity of sunflower seeds than the remaining treatments.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse5
Organ / stage
seedse5
Treatment
the application of LOF at 1.50 L/fede6
Outcome
flavonoids and antioxidant activity (DPPH radical scavenging)e5
Direction
bettere5
Comparator
remaining treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“produced better agronomic performance of yield components, carbohydrates, protein, oil, flavonoids and antioxidant activity (DPPH radical scavenging) of sunflower seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–939 · show in text ↑
e6

“Under water stress, the application of LOF at 1.50 L/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–770 · show in text ↑
e4

“over remaining treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–965 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

LOF at 1.50 L/fed could be used for optimum sunflower production.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse7
Outcome
optimum sunflower productione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“This dosage could be used for optimum sunflower production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1025 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

361 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

application · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.