Paper · 2012 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

Does exogenous application of salicylic acid improve growth and some key physiological attributes in sunfl ower plants subjected to salt stress?

Noreen, Sibgha; Ashraf, Muhammad; Akram, Nudrat Aisha

17
claims
32
verbatim quotes
36
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

To appraise the effect of foliar-applied salicylic acid (SA) on growth and some key physiological attributes in sunflower plants under salt stress, a greenhouse experiment was conducted. Two sunflower lines (Hysun-33 and SF-187) were subjected to non-saline (control) and saline regimes (120 mM NaCl). After 14 days of initiation of salt treatment plants of both sunflower lines were supplied with varying levels (100, 200 and 300 mg L-1) of SA applied foliarly to all sunflower plants exposed to normal or saline substrates. After 21 days of SA application, data for growth (shoot biomass), photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a and b), water relation components, and accumulation of proline and mineral nutrients were recorded. Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines. Foliar-applied SA improved growth, chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, and leaf and root Ca2+ concentrations. Of all salicylic acid levels used in the present study, 200 and 300 mg L-1 were found to be relatively more effective than the other levels in improving chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, leaf and root Ca2+ concentration, while the other attributes remained unaffected due to SA application. Of both sunflower lines, Hysun-33 had higher amounts of photosynthetic pigments and essential nutrients than did SF-187.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress adversely affected growth in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflower plantsHelianthus annuuse1
Material
both sunflower linese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress adversely affected chlorophyll pigments in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflower plantsHelianthus annuuse1
Material
both sunflower linese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll pigmentse0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress adversely affected water relations in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflower plantsHelianthus annuuse1
Material
both sunflower linese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
water relationse0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress adversely affected contents of some key mineral nutrients in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflower plantsHelianthus annuuse1
Material
both sunflower linese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
contents of some key mineral nutrientse0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased proline in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflower plantsHelianthus annuuse1
Material
both sunflower linese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased leaf and root Na+ in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflower plantsHelianthus annuuse1
Material
both sunflower linese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
leaf and root Na+e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress increased Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.

Taxon
sunflower plantsHelianthus annuuse1
Material
both sunflower linese0
Treatment
Salt stresse0
Outcome
Cl- contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Salt stress adversely affected the growth, chlorophyll pigments, water relations and contents of some key mineral nutrients, while increased the amount of proline and leaf and root Na+ as well as Cl- contents in both sunflower lines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“sunflower plants under salt stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–146 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied SA improved growth.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Foliar-applied SAe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-applied SA improved growth, chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, and leaf and root Ca2+ concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied SA improved chlorophyll a and b pigments.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Foliar-applied SAe0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b pigmentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-applied SA improved growth, chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, and leaf and root Ca2+ concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied SA improved leaf turgor potential.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Foliar-applied SAe0
Outcome
leaf turgor potentiale0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-applied SA improved growth, chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, and leaf and root Ca2+ concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied SA improved leaf and root Ca2+ concentrations.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Foliar-applied SAe0
Outcome
leaf and root Ca2+ concentrationse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar-applied SA improved growth, chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, and leaf and root Ca2+ concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1091 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 and 300 mg L-1 salicylic acid levels were relatively more effective for chlorophyll a and b pigments.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
200 and 300 mg L-1e0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b pigmentse0
Direction
relatively more effectivee0
Comparator
the other levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of all salicylic acid levels used in the present study, 200 and 300 mg L-1 were found to be relatively more effective than the other levels in improving chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, leaf and root Ca2+ concentration, while the other attributes remained unaffected due to SA application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 and 300 mg L-1 salicylic acid levels were relatively more effective for leaf turgor potential.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
200 and 300 mg L-1e0
Outcome
leaf turgor potentiale0
Direction
relatively more effectivee0
Comparator
the other levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of all salicylic acid levels used in the present study, 200 and 300 mg L-1 were found to be relatively more effective than the other levels in improving chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, leaf and root Ca2+ concentration, while the other attributes remained unaffected due to SA application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 and 300 mg L-1 salicylic acid levels were relatively more effective for leaf and root Ca2+ concentration.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
200 and 300 mg L-1e0
Outcome
leaf and root Ca2+ concentratione0
Direction
relatively more effectivee0
Comparator
the other levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of all salicylic acid levels used in the present study, 200 and 300 mg L-1 were found to be relatively more effective than the other levels in improving chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, leaf and root Ca2+ concentration, while the other attributes remained unaffected due to SA application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other attributes remained unaffected by SA application.

Taxon
sunfl ower plantsHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
SA applicatione0
Outcome
the other attributese0
Direction
remained unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of all salicylic acid levels used in the present study, 200 and 300 mg L-1 were found to be relatively more effective than the other levels in improving chlorophyll a and b pigments, leaf turgor potential, leaf and root Ca2+ concentration, while the other attributes remained unaffected due to SA application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1401 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunfl ower plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–118 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hysun-33 had higher amounts of photosynthetic pigments than SF-187.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Hysun-33e0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigmentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SF-187e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of both sunflower lines, Hysun-33 had higher amounts of photosynthetic pigments and essential nutrients than did SF-187.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1522 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hysun-33 had higher amounts of essential nutrients than SF-187.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Material
Hysun-33e0
Outcome
essential nutrientse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SF-187e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of both sunflower lines, Hysun-33 had higher amounts of photosynthetic pigments and essential nutrients than did SF-187.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1522 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: water · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

53 papers: 6 positive, 47 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 2 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.