Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Health Sciences

Growth and biochemical response of ocimum basilicum l. plant under critical drought environmental

Omar N. Al-Samarrai; Maher C. Ghassan F. Al- Samarrai

6
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Study curried out to evolution response growth and biochemical of Ocimum basilicum L. under drought conditions. Plant grown under treatment conditions (24 hours with - 54°C, 21°C, 55-70% RH) and plant were transferred to growth chamber for 6 weeks. The results showed that the rate of increase in chlorophyll a and b was significant with an increase rate of 1.7 and 0.6 compared to control after three days of treatment. The results also showed that H2O2 content was increased and reached to 1.3, 2.8 and 3.5X compared to the control after three, six and nine days of treatment respectively. One the other hand the levels of the enzyme APX activity, Lipid peroxidation and protein which was conducted on the tissue of basil leaves, increase compared with control after three days of treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil chlorophyll a increased significantly by 1.7 versus control after three days.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicum L.Ocimum basilicume1
Treatment
drought conditionse2
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
increasee0
Value
1.7e0
Qualifier
after three days of treatmente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of increase in chlorophyll a and b was significant with an increase rate of 1.7 and 0.6 compared to control after three days of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil chlorophyll b increased significantly by 0.6 versus control after three days.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicum L.Ocimum basilicume1
Treatment
drought conditionse2
Outcome
be0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.6e0
Qualifier
after three days of treatmente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rate of increase in chlorophyll a and b was significant with an increase rate of 1.7 and 0.6 compared to control after three days of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–419 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil H2O2 content increased to 1.3 times control after three days.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicum L.Ocimum basilicume1
Treatment
drought conditionse2
Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.3e0
Qualifier
after three, six and nine days of treatment respectivelye0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2O2 content was increased and reached to 1.3, 2.8 and 3.5X compared to the control after three, six and nine days of treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil H2O2 content increased to 2.8 times control after six days.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicum L.Ocimum basilicume1
Treatment
drought conditionse2
Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.8e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2O2 content was increased and reached to 1.3, 2.8 and 3.5X compared to the control after three, six and nine days of treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil H2O2 content increased to 3.5X control after nine days.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicum L.Ocimum basilicume1
Treatment
drought conditionse2
Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.5Xe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H2O2 content was increased and reached to 1.3, 2.8 and 3.5X compared to the control after three, six and nine days of treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 450–590 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basil leaf APX activity, lipid peroxidation and protein increased versus control after three days.

Taxon
Ocimum basilicum L.Ocimum basilicume1
Organ / stage
basil leavese0
Treatment
drought conditionse2
Outcome
APX activity, Lipid peroxidation and proteine0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
after three days of treatmente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ocimum basilicum
Ocimum basilicum · TaxonCastielli · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“levels of the enzyme APX activity, Lipid peroxidation and protein which was conducted on the tissue of basil leaves, increase compared with control after three days of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–792 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ocimum basilicum L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–110 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Ocimum basilicum (basil)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.