Paper · 2022 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effects of different LED light and nitrogen application on growth of lettuce plants and leaf nitrate content

Sezer Sahin; Sevgi Dincer Seckin

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Leaf nitrate contents of vegetables and other plants vary. The quantity of light and nitrogen in the environment is one of the most important factors affecting the nitrate metabolism of plant leaves. For this reason, 3 different doses of nitrogen (50, 100 and 150 ppm) were applied to the lettuce plant grown in soilless culture in the greenhouse during the spring period and light-emitting diode (LED) lights (red, purple, blue, and yellow and their combinations) were applied on the plant. Light applications were operated in the automatic system between 8 am and 24 pm. The light intensity on the plant was measured with a light meter at 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. The effects of applications of different LED lights and nitrogen doses on the marketable plant head weight, plant diameter, and chlorophyll ratio of the lettuce plant were found to be statistically significant, but its effect on Brix-Water Soluble Dry Matter (WSDM), pH, and titrable acid ratios were not found statistically significant. Considering the averages, while the head weight was 435 g/piece in the 50 ppm N application, it was 832 g/piece in the 150 ppm N application. Red LED light application, which is one of the lighting applications, provides an increase in efficiency compared to the control. While the leaf nitrate content of lettuce was 1213.2 ppm in the 50 ppm N application, considering the averages, it was measured as 1935.4 ppm in the 150 ppm application. The results show that the preference of dose of N to be applied in the lettuce plant is significant in the relationship between yield and nitrate, and plant growth increases with additional light application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LED and nitrogen applications significantly affected marketable head weight, plant diameter and chlorophyll ratio.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
different LED lights and nitrogen dosese1
Outcome
marketable plant head weight, plant diameter, and chlorophyll ratioe1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effects of applications of different LED lights and nitrogen doses on the marketable plant head weight, plant diameter, and chlorophyll ratio of the lettuce plant were found to be statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

LED and nitrogen applications did not significantly affect Brix-WSDM, pH and titrable acid ratio.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
different LED lights and nitrogen dosese2
Outcome
Brix-Water Soluble Dry Matter (WSDM), pH, and titrable acid ratiose1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“its effect on Brix-Water Soluble Dry Matter (WSDM), pH, and titrable acid ratios were not found statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–996 · show in text ↑
e2

“applications of different LED lights and nitrogen doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–730 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean head weight was 435 g/piece at 50 ppm N.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
50 ppm N applicatione1
Outcome
head weighte1
Value
435 g/piecee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“head weight was 435 g/piece in the 50 ppm N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1089 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean head weight was 832 g/piece at 150 ppm N.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
150 ppm N applicatione1
Outcome
head weighte2
Value
832 g/piecee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“it was 832 g/piece in the 150 ppm N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1138 · show in text ↑
e2

“head weight was 435 g/piece”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED light increased efficiency versus control.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
Red LED light applicatione1
Outcome
efficiencye1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Red LED light application, which is one of the lighting applications, provides an increase in efficiency compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1269 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrate content was 1213.2 ppm at 50 ppm N.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
50 ppm N applicatione0
Outcome
leaf nitrate contente0
Value
1213.2 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf nitrate content of lettuce was 1213.2 ppm in the 50 ppm N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1354 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrate content was 1935.4 ppm at 150 ppm N.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
150 ppm applicatione0
Outcome
leaf nitrate contente0
Value
1935.4 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf nitrate content of lettuce was 1213.2 ppm in the 50 ppm N application, considering the averages, it was measured as 1935.4 ppm in the 150 ppm application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Additional light increased plant growth.

Taxon
lettuce plantsLactuca sativae0
Treatment
additional light applicatione1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of lettuce plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“plant growth increases with additional light application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1647 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen dose choice is important to the yield-nitrate relationship in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuce plantLactuca sativae0
Outcome
preference of dose of N to be appliede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“preference of dose of N to be applied in the lettuce plant is significant in the relationship between yield and nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1585 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · quality: sugar starch · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

light · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 243 positive, 57 negative or no effect

242 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.