Paper · 2022 · Crop Science

Outliers and their distribution in breeding populations

Rex Bernardo

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Outliers with highly superior performance are valuable in plant breeding, but their distribution in populations has not been well‐studied. My objectives were to determine (a) if outliers behave in a predictable manner; (b) if they are distributed according to a normal distribution as is assumed for quantitative traits; and (c) which parental characteristics are indicative of the best chances of getting progeny with extreme performance. All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software. Ten million lines were simulated within each cross for a total of 1.05 billion lines. Within each biparental population, recombinant inbreds in the top 1.0, 0.1, and 0.01% tails had a continuous distribution, indicating that outliers behave in a predictable manner but are rare in practice only because the population sizes used in breeding are small. Having a finite number of loci led to slight kurtosis, which caused a minor upward bias when the usefulness criterion was applied to the extreme upper tails. The midparent value was an excellent indicator of which biparental crosses had high upper‐tail means, to the extent that modeling the genetic variance within each biparental population had little added benefit. In the simulations, selection for protein concentration and Fusarium ( F. graminearum ) head blight resistance decreased the gains for yield and changed the biparental population that led to the highest yield gains. Results indicated that having one very large breeding population in a select‐only scheme is inferior to two or more select‐and‐recombine cycles with smaller populations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Recombinant inbreds in the top 1.0, 0.1 and 0.01% tails of each simulated biparental barley population had a continuous distribution.

Outcome
continuous distributione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–583 · show in text ↑
e2

“Within each biparental population, recombinant inbreds in the top 1.0, 0.1, and 0.01% tails had a continuous distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–792 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Outliers in simulated barley populations are rare in practice only because the population sizes used in breeding are small.

Outcome
rare in practicee3
Qualifier
the population sizes used in breeding are smalle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–583 · show in text ↑
e3

“indicating that outliers behave in a predictable manner but are rare in practice only because the population sizes used in breeding are small”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

A finite number of loci in the simulated barley crosses caused slight kurtosis and a minor upward bias for the extreme upper tails of the usefulness criterion.

Outcome
minor upward biase4
Qualifier
Having a finite number of loci led to slight kurtosise4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–583 · show in text ↑
e4

“Having a finite number of loci led to slight kurtosis, which caused a minor upward bias when the usefulness criterion was applied to the extreme upper tails”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1093 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The midparent value was an excellent indicator of which biparental barley crosses had high upper‐tail means, so modeling genetic variance added little.

Outcome
high upper‐tail meanse5
Comparator
modeling the genetic variance within each biparental populatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–583 · show in text ↑
e5

“The midparent value was an excellent indicator of which biparental crosses had high upper‐tail means, to the extent that modeling the genetic variance within each biparental population had little added benefit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1304 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, selection for protein concentration and Fusarium head blight resistance decreased the gains for yield in barley.

Treatment
selection for protein concentration and Fusarium ( F. graminearum ) head blight resistancee6
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume6pathogen
Outcome
gains for yielde6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–583 · show in text ↑
e6

“selection for protein concentration and Fusarium ( F. graminearum ) head blight resistance decreased the gains for yield and changed the biparental population that led to the highest yield gains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1520 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, selection for protein concentration and Fusarium head blight resistance changed the biparental population that gave the highest yield gains.

Treatment
selection for protein concentration and Fusarium ( F. graminearum ) head blight resistancee6
Outcome
the biparental population that led to the highest yield gainse6
Direction
changede6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–583 · show in text ↑
e6

“selection for protein concentration and Fusarium ( F. graminearum ) head blight resistance decreased the gains for yield and changed the biparental population that led to the highest yield gains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

One very large breeding population in a select‐only scheme is inferior to two or more select‐and‐recombine cycles with smaller populations.

Treatment
having one very large breeding population in a select‐only schemee7
Outcome
is inferiore7
Direction
inferiore7
Comparator
two or more select‐and‐recombine cycles with smaller populationse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All possible biparental populations were made among 15 simulated barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) parental lines in BreedingGames software”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–583 · show in text ↑
e7

“Results indicated that having one very large breeding population in a select‐only scheme is inferior to two or more select‐and‐recombine cycles with smaller populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1690 · show in text ↑

Fusarium graminearum · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Fusarium · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.