Paper · 2022 · Horticultural Plant Journal

Grafting effects on bioactive compounds, chemical and agronomic traits of ‘Corbarino’ tomato grown under greenhouse healthy conditions

Mario Parisi; Alfonso Pentangelo; Antonietta D'Alessandro; et al.

14
claims
31
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In tomatoes, grafting onto resistant rootstocks represents an effective strategy to control several soil-borne diseases that reduce crop profitability, especially for landraces with little or no resistance to multiple pathogens/pests. In this study, the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks to evaluate graft compatibility, yield performance, and qualitative characteristics under greenhouse healthy conditions. Three rootstocks were the most effective in improving fruit yield without negatively affecting the carpometric, technological, and health-related traits of the traditional tomato. ‘Dinafort’ rootstock increased fresh and dry yield, harvest index, and fruit/clusters, while mean fruit weight, shape index, total and soluble solid content, simple sugars, organic acids, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene content did not differ with respect to the ungrafted ‘Corbarino’. ‘Interpro’ rootstock also showed promising results for the overall yield and quality traits, although it reduced the trans-lycopene content in the fruit. ‘Silex’ rootstock showed the highest harvest index as result of decreased vigour. The fruit quality induced by ‘Silex’ was satisfactory and high levels of simple sugars, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene were also observed. However, graft success, especially for ‘Dinafort’ and ‘Silex’, needs to be improved by investigating more suitable methods for seedling production, grafting, acclimatization, etc.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three rootstocks improved tomato fruit yield without negatively affecting carpometric, technological and health-related traits.

Treatment
Three rootstockse1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
improvinge1
Qualifier
without negatively affecting the carpometric, technological, and health-related traitse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Three rootstocks were the most effective in improving fruit yield without negatively affecting the carpometric, technological, and health-related traits of the traditional tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinafort rootstock increased fresh and dry yield and harvest index of tomato.

Material
Dinaforte2
Treatment
rootstocke2
Outcome
fresh and dry yield, harvest indexe2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Dinafort’ rootstock increased fresh and dry yield, harvest index, and fruit/clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–746 · show in text ↑
e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinafort rootstock increased fruit/clusters in tomato.

Material
Dinaforte2
Treatment
rootstocke2
Outcome
fruit/clusterse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Dinafort’ rootstock increased fresh and dry yield, harvest index, and fruit/clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–746 · show in text ↑
e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinafort rootstock did not change mean fruit weight or shape index relative to ungrafted Corbarino.

Material
Dinaforte2
Treatment
rootstocke2
Outcome
mean fruit weight, shape indexe4
Direction
did not differe4
Comparator
ungraftede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Dinafort’ rootstock increased fresh and dry yield, harvest index, and fruit/clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–746 · show in text ↑
e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e4

“mean fruit weight, shape index, total and soluble solid content, simple sugars, organic acids, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene content did not differ with respect to the ungrafted ‘Corbarino’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinafort rootstock did not change total and soluble solid content relative to ungrafted Corbarino.

Material
Dinaforte2
Treatment
rootstocke2
Outcome
total and soluble solid contente4
Direction
did not differe4
Comparator
ungraftede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Dinafort’ rootstock increased fresh and dry yield, harvest index, and fruit/clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–746 · show in text ↑
e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e4

“mean fruit weight, shape index, total and soluble solid content, simple sugars, organic acids, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene content did not differ with respect to the ungrafted ‘Corbarino’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinafort rootstock did not change simple sugars, organic acids or flavonoids relative to ungrafted Corbarino.

Material
Dinaforte2
Treatment
rootstocke2
Outcome
simple sugars, organic acids, flavonoidse4
Direction
did not differe4
Comparator
ungraftede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Dinafort’ rootstock increased fresh and dry yield, harvest index, and fruit/clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–746 · show in text ↑
e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e4

“mean fruit weight, shape index, total and soluble solid content, simple sugars, organic acids, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene content did not differ with respect to the ungrafted ‘Corbarino’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dinafort rootstock did not change ascorbic acid or trans-lycopene content relative to ungrafted Corbarino.

Material
Dinaforte2
Treatment
rootstocke2
Outcome
ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene contente4
Direction
did not differe4
Comparator
ungraftede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“‘Dinafort’ rootstock increased fresh and dry yield, harvest index, and fruit/clusters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–746 · show in text ↑
e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e4

“mean fruit weight, shape index, total and soluble solid content, simple sugars, organic acids, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene content did not differ with respect to the ungrafted ‘Corbarino’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interpro rootstock showed promising overall yield and quality traits in tomato.

Material
Interproe5
Treatment
rootstocke5
Outcome
overall yield and quality traitse5
Direction
promisinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e5

“‘Interpro’ rootstock also showed promising results for the overall yield and quality traits, although it reduced the trans-lycopene content in the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interpro rootstock reduced trans-lycopene content in tomato fruit.

Material
Interproe5
Treatment
rootstocke5
Outcome
trans-lycopene contente5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e5

“‘Interpro’ rootstock also showed promising results for the overall yield and quality traits, although it reduced the trans-lycopene content in the fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silex rootstock showed the highest harvest index in tomato, as a result of decreased vigour.

Material
Silexe6
Treatment
rootstocke6
Outcome
harvest indexe6
Direction
higheste6
Qualifier
as result of decreased vigoure6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e6

“‘Silex’ rootstock showed the highest harvest index as result of decreased vigour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1195 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality induced by Silex rootstock was satisfactory in tomato.

Treatment
Silexe7
Outcome
fruit qualitye7
Qualifier
satisfactorye7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e7

“The fruit quality induced by ‘Silex’ was satisfactory and high levels of simple sugars, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene were also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silex rootstock gave high levels of simple sugars and flavonoids in tomato fruit.

Treatment
Silexe7
Outcome
simple sugars, flavonoidse7
Direction
high levelse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e7

“The fruit quality induced by ‘Silex’ was satisfactory and high levels of simple sugars, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene were also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silex rootstock gave high levels of ascorbic acid and trans-lycopene in tomato fruit.

Treatment
Silexe7
Outcome
ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopenee7
Direction
high levelse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e7

“The fruit quality induced by ‘Silex’ was satisfactory and high levels of simple sugars, flavonoids, ascorbic acid, and trans-lycopene were also observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1349 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Graft success, especially for Dinafort and Silex, needs to be improved by investigating better methods for seedling production, grafting and acclimatization.

Outcome
graft successe0
Qualifier
needs to be improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“the high-value ‘Corbarino’ tomato landrace was grafted onto seven commercial Solanum interspecific rootstocks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–359 · show in text ↑
e0

“graft success, especially for ‘Dinafort’ and ‘Silex’, needs to be improved by investigating more suitable methods for seedling production, grafting, acclimatization, etc”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1529 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

grafting · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 15 positive, 12 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

27 papers: 13 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 151 positive, 25 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.