Paper · 2022 · 2022 12th International Conference on Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics

Nitric oxide level modification on antioxidant enzyme activity, antioxidant capacity and pericarp browning of postharvest longan fruit

Sitthisak Intarasit; Kamolchanok Umnajkitikorn; Kobkiat Saengnil

18
claims
64
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Overproduction of nitric oxide free radical (•NO) potentially causes the reduction in antioxidant defense system, damaging cell components and leading to physiological disorders in postharvest horticultural crops. In this study, the effects of sodium nitroprusside (SNP; NO donor) or 2-(4-carboxyphenyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl-3-oxide (cPTIO; NO scavenger) on antioxidant enzyme activities, antioxidant capacity and pericarp browning development of harvested longan fruit were investigated. Longan fruits were dipped in distilled water (control), SNP (50 and 100 mM) or cPTIO (100 and 500 μM) for 10 min, then stored at 25 ± 1 °C for 7 d. It was shown that antioxidant enzyme activities including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and total antioxidant capacity including ABTS and DPPH decreased during storage. These reductions coincided with an increase in pericarp browning (browning index). Enzyme activity and antioxidant capacity assays confirmed our results that NO involved in longan pericarp browning. The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX were reduced by 2.5-71.5%, 30.6-66.1%, 26.7-75.5% and 34.3-68.7%, respectively, after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO. In addition, the total antioxidant capacity ABTS and DPPH were reduced by 13.3-66.8% and 17.6-49.4%, respectively, after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 3.6-58.8% and 2.0-128.7%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO. Treatment with 100 mM of SNP was more efficient in inhibited the activity and capacity of antioxidant than that of 50 mM SNP. In contrast, the cPTIO-treated fruit exhibited opposite results by maintaining antioxidant enzyme activities and antioxidant capacity, corresponding to the reduction in pericarp browning. Treatment with 500 μM of cPTIO was more efficient in increased the activity and capacity of antioxidant than that of 100 μM SNP. The antioxidant potential and development of pericarp browning depended on the applied concentration of SNP or cPTIO. These results revealed that exposure to excessive NO resulted in the reduction in antioxidant potential and the increment of pericarp browning of harvested longan fruit.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities and total antioxidant capacity decreased during storage.

Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
during storagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant enzyme activities including superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione peroxidase (GPX) and total antioxidant capacity including ABTS and DPPH decreased during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pericarp browning increased as antioxidant measures declined.

Organ / stage
pericarpe0
Outcome
pericarp browning (browning index)e0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These reductions coincided with an increase in pericarp browning (browning index)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP reduced SOD activity by 2.5-71.5% after seven days.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
SODe2
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.5-71.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD, CAT, APX and GPX were reduced by 2.5-71.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP reduced CAT activity by 30.6-66.1% after seven days.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
CATe2
Direction
reducede0
Value
30.6-66.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD, CAT, APX and GPX were reduced by 2.5-71.5%, 30.6-66.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP reduced APX activity by 26.7-75.5% after seven days.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
APXe2
Direction
reducede0
Value
26.7-75.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD, CAT, APX and GPX were reduced by 2.5-71.5%, 30.6-66.1%, 26.7-75.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP reduced GPX activity by 34.3-68.7% after seven days.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
GPXe2
Direction
reducede0
Value
34.3-68.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SOD, CAT, APX and GPX were reduced by 2.5-71.5%, 30.6-66.1%, 26.7-75.5% and 34.3-68.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO increased SOD activity by 2.4-109.6%.

Treatment
cPTIOe1
Outcome
SODe2
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.4-109.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were increased by 2.4-109.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1274 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO increased CAT activity by 3.8-153.8%.

Treatment
cPTIOe1
Outcome
CATe2
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.8-153.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1286 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO increased APX activity by 6.3-47.1%.

Treatment
cPTIOe1
Outcome
APXe2
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.3-47.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO increased GPX activity by 31.9-156.5%.

Treatment
cPTIOe1
Outcome
GPXe2
Direction
increasede0
Value
31.9-156.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“The activity of SOD, CAT, APX and GPX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP reduced ABTS antioxidant capacity by 13.3-66.8%.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
ABTSe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.3-66.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABTS and DPPH were reduced by 13.3-66.8% and 17.6-49.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP reduced DPPH antioxidant capacity by 17.6-49.4%.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
DPPHe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17.6-49.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABTS and DPPH were reduced by 13.3-66.8% and 17.6-49.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1456 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO increased ABTS capacity by 3.6-58.8%.

Treatment
cPTIOe1
Outcome
ABTSe2
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.6-58.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABTS and DPPH were reduced by 13.3-66.8% and 17.6-49.4%, respectively, after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 3.6-58.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1531 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“the total antioxidant capacity ABTS and DPPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO increased DPPH capacity by 2.0-128.7%.

Treatment
cPTIOe1
Outcome
DPPHe2
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.0-128.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ABTS and DPPH were reduced by 13.3-66.8% and 17.6-49.4%, respectively, after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 3.6-58.8% and 2.0-128.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
e2

“the total antioxidant capacity ABTS and DPPH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1414 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 mM SNP inhibited antioxidant activity and capacity more than 50 mM SNP.

Treatment
100 mM of SNPe0
Outcome
activity and capacity of antioxidante0
Direction
more efficient in inhibitede0
Comparator
50 mM SNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 100 mM of SNP was more efficient in inhibited the activity and capacity of antioxidant than that of 50 mM SNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1714 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO maintained antioxidant enzyme activity and capacity and reduced pericarp browning.

Treatment
cPTIO-treatede0
Outcome
pericarp browninge0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cPTIO-treated fruit exhibited opposite results by maintaining antioxidant enzyme activities and antioxidant capacity, corresponding to the reduction in pericarp browning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1902 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 μM cPTIO increased antioxidant activity and capacity more efficiently than 100 μM SNP.

Treatment
500 μM of cPTIOe0
Outcome
activity and capacity of antioxidante0
Direction
more efficient in increasede0
Comparator
100 μM SNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with 500 μM of cPTIO was more efficient in increased the activity and capacity of antioxidant than that of 100 μM SNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2031 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive nitric oxide reduced antioxidant potential and increased browning.

Treatment
excessive NOe0
Outcome
antioxidant potentiale0
Direction
reductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dimocarpus longan
Dimocarpus longan · TaxonBùi Thụy Đào Nguyên · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exposure to excessive NO resulted in the reduction in antioxidant potential and the increment of pericarp browning of harvested longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2179–2319 · show in text ↑
t0

“longan fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“after SNP treatment for 7 d but were increased by 2.4-109.6%, 3.8-153.8%, 6.3-47.1% and 31.9-156.5%, respectively, after treatment with cPTIO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1355 · show in text ↑

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Dimocarpus longan (longan)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · molecular: metabolites · Dimocarpus longan (longan)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.