Paper · 2021 · Environment Control in Biology

Quantification of the Effects of Alternating and Simultaneous Red and Blue Irradiations on Plant Morphology and Shoot Fresh Weight in Leaf Lettuce‘Greenwave’

Kaito MASUDA; Hiroshi NAKASHIMA; Juro MIYASAKA; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A mechanism of increasing the shoot fresh weight (SFW) of leaf lettuce under alternating red (R) and blue (B) irradiation by light-emitting diodes (LEDs) was investigated based on plant morphogenesis. Seedlings of leaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa‘Greenwave’) were cultivated under seven alternating irradiations, i.e., R24B0, R20B4, R16B8, R12B12, R8B16, R4B20 and R0B24, in which RxBy implies x and y hours of irradiation for red and blue LEDs, respectively. The results of these treatments were compared to those of two simultaneous irradiations: one containing no dark periods and the other containing a 12-hour period, i.e., sR24B24 at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 100 μmol m-2 s-1, and sR12B12 at a PPFD of 200 μmol m-2 s-1. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to investigate the causal relationship between the plant morphological characteristics (PMs) and SFW. The increase in the number of leaves with the red-light period in alternating irradiation treatments increased the total leaf area and consequently the SFW. On the other hand, the difference between PMs in alternating and simultaneous irradiations depended on the individual leaf area (ILA), where ILA under alternating irradiation treatments was significantly larger compared to that under simultaneous irradiation treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer red-light periods in alternating irradiation increased lettuce leaf number.

Taxon
Leaf Lettucet0
Treatment
red-light period in alternating irradiation treatmentse0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in the number of leaves with the red-light period in alternating irradiation treatments increased the total leaf area and consequently the SFW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1059 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More leaves increased total leaf area and consequently shoot fresh weight.

Taxon
Leaf Lettucet0
Outcome
total leaf area and consequently the SFWe0
Qualifier
increase in the number of leavese0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“The increase in the number of leaves with the red-light period in alternating irradiation treatments increased the total leaf area and consequently the SFW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1059 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual leaf area was significantly larger under alternating than simultaneous irradiation.

Taxon
Leaf Lettucet0
Treatment
alternating irradiation treatmentse0
Outcome
ILAe0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
simultaneous irradiation treatmentse0

Verbatim

t0

“Leaf Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 134–146 · show in text ↑
e0

“ILA under alternating irradiation treatments was significantly larger compared to that under simultaneous irradiation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1330 · show in text ↑

radiation · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

43 papers: 27 positive, 16 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.