Abstract
This research was carried out during both 2019 and 2020 seasons to study the influence of the two investigated factors i.e., Lecont pear budded on two rootstocks (Betulaefolia and Communis) and some mineral and bio-fertilizers on some vegetative growth measurements. Results data showed that, Betulaefolia rootstock was better than Communis rootstock in this respect. Also, Concerning the specific effect of the different bio-fertilizers data indicated that, fertilizer with Nitrobein at 5 g/ transplant + Phosphorein at 5 g/ transplant + Potasein at 5 g/ transplant + Effective microorganisms (EM) at 50 cm./ transplant +3/4 dose of mineral fertilizers (75%) was superior in this respect. Concerning the interaction effect the highest vegetative growth were obtained with the combination between Lecont pear transplants budded on Betulaefolia rootstock and fertilized with soil application of Nitrobein at 5 g/ transplant + Phosphorein at 5 g/ transplant + Potasein at 5 g/ transplant + Effective microorganisms (EM) at 50 cm./ transplant +3/4 dose of mineral fertilizers (75%), however the lowest values were noticed by Lecont pear transplants budded on Communis rootstock and fertilizer with mineral element (control) during the two seasons of study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Betulaefolia rootstock gave better pear vegetative growth than Communis.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Material
- Betulaefoliae0
- Treatment
- Betulaefolia rootstocke0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth measurementse1
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- Communis rootstocke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Betulaefolia rootstock was better than Communis rootstock in this respect”
e1“some vegetative growth measurements”
t0“LECONT CV. PEAR”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined biofertilizer and 75% mineral fertilizer treatment was superior for pear vegetative growth.
- Taxon
- PEAR
Pyrus communist0 - Treatment
- Nitrobein at 5 g/ transplant + Phosphorein at 5 g/ transplant + Potasein at 5 g/ transplant + Effective microorganisms (EM) at 50 cm./ transplant +3/4 dose of mineral fertilizers (75%)e0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth measurementse1
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“fertilizer with Nitrobein at 5 g/ transplant + Phosphorein at 5 g/ transplant + Potasein at 5 g/ transplant + Effective microorganisms (EM) at 50 cm./ transplant +3/4 dose of mineral fertilizers (75%) was superior in this respect”
e1“some vegetative growth measurements”
t0“LECONT CV. PEAR”
Claim · model-written summary
Betulaefolia with the combined fertilizer treatment produced the highest pear transplant vegetative growth.
- Taxon
- pear
Pyrus communise0 - Material
- Betulaefoliae0
- Treatment
- soil application of Nitrobein at 5 g/ transplant + Phosphorein at 5 g/ transplant + Potasein at 5 g/ transplant + Effective microorganisms (EM) at 50 cm./ transplant +3/4 dose of mineral fertilizers (75%)e0
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the highest vegetative growth were obtained with the combination between Lecont pear transplants budded on Betulaefolia rootstock and fertilized with soil application of Nitrobein at 5 g/ transplant + Phosphorein at 5 g/ transplant + Potasein at 5 g/ transplant + Effective microorganisms (EM) at 50 cm./ transplant +3/4 dose of mineral fertilizers (75%)”
t0“LECONT CV. PEAR”
Claim · model-written summary
Communis with mineral fertilizer control had the lowest pear transplant vegetative growth.
- Taxon
- pear
Pyrus communise0 - Material
- Communise0
- Treatment
- fertilizer with mineral element (control)e0
- Outcome
- vegetative growthe1
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“the lowest values were noticed by Lecont pear transplants budded on Communis rootstock and fertilizer with mineral element (control)”
e1“the highest vegetative growth were obtained”
t0“LECONT CV. PEAR”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →grafting · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →fertilization · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.